Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly. Under certain concurrent event orderings, a wasmtime::Engine's internal type registry was susceptible to double-unregistration bugs due to a race condition, leading to panics and potentially type registry corruption. That registry corruption could, following an additional and particular sequence of concurrent events, lead to violations of WebAssembly's control-flow integrity (CFI) and type safety. Users that do not use wasmtime::Engine across multiple threads are not affected. Users that only create new modules across threads over time are additionally not affected. Reproducing this bug requires creating and dropping multiple type instances (such as wasmtime::FuncType or wasmtime::ArrayType) concurrently on multiple threads, where all types are associated with the same wasmtime::Engine. Wasm guests cannot trigger this bug. See the "References" section below for a list of Wasmtime types-related APIs that are affected. Wasmtime maintains an internal registry of types within a wasmtime::Engine and an engine is shareable across threads. Types can be created and referenced through creation of a wasmtime::Module, creation of wasmtime::FuncType, or a number of other APIs where the host creates a function (see "References" below). Each of these cases interacts with an engine to deduplicate type information and manage type indices that are used to implement type checks in WebAssembly's call_indirect function, for example. This bug is a race condition in this management where the internal type registry could be corrupted to trigger an assert or contain invalid state. Wasmtime's internal representation of a type has individual types (e.g. one-per-host-function) maintain a registration count of how many time it's been used. Types additionally have state within an engine behind a read-write lock such as lookup/deduplication information. The race here is a time-of-check versus time-of-use (TOCTOU) bug where one thread atomically decrements a type entry's registration count, observes zero registrations, and then acquires a lock in order to unregister that entry. However, between when this first thread observed the zero-registration count and when it acquires that lock, another thread could perform the following sequence of events: re-register another copy of the type, which deduplicates to that same entry, resurrecting it and incrementing its registration count; then drop the type and decrement its registration count; observe that the registration count is now zero; acquire the type registry lock; and finally unregister the type. Now, when the original thread finally acquires the lock and unregisters the entry, it is the second time this entry has been unregistered. This bug was originally introduced in Wasmtime 19's development of the WebAssembly GC proposal. This bug affects users who are not using the GC proposal, however, and affects Wasmtime in its default configuration even when the GC proposal is disabled. Wasmtime users using 19.0.0 and after are all affected by this issue. We have released the following Wasmtime versions, all of which have a fix for this bug: * 21.0.2 * 22.0.1 * 23.0.3 * 24.0.1 * 25.0.2. If your application creates and drops Wasmtime types on multiple threads concurrently, there are no known workarounds. Users are encouraged to upgrade to a patched release.
CVE-2024-47813
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 2.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2024-10-09. NVD baseline CVSS 2.9; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2024-2985 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7qmx-3fpx-r45m (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 2.9
- EG Score
- 2.9LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 13EG Risk 13/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity29% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 2.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 4th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (2.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 2.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 2.9 LOWCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 9, 2024
Last Modified
September 29, 2025
References (2)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/7969Product
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-7qmx-3fpx-r45mThird Party Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-47813(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| rust | wasmtime @ 21.0.2 (fixes >= 19.0.0, < 21.0.2) | — | ghsa |
| rust | wasmtime @ 22.0.1 (fixes >= 22.0.0, < 22.0.1) | — | ghsa |
| rust | wasmtime @ 23.0.3 (fixes >= 23.0.0, < 23.0.3) | — | ghsa |
| rust | wasmtime @ 24.0.1 (fixes >= 24.0.0, < 24.0.1) | — | ghsa |
| rust | wasmtime @ 25.0.2 (fixes >= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wasmtime | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rust-wasmtime | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rust-wasmtime | — |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wasmtime | 0.0.1 ... 9.0.0 (68 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 206 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 112 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7qmx-3fpx-r45m · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 2.9
- 2026-11-01 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-25 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-25 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-18 06:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-20 21:53 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-09-01 20:58 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-15 22:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:wasmtime · Debian:13:rust-wasmtime
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-47813?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-47813 published?
Is CVE-2024-47813 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-47813?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-47813?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-47813
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-47813?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.