CVE-2024-49998

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-43672 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3xm8-389p-x4rm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence

Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens to reproduce there.

The first problem is that lan9303 is unique among DSA drivers in that it calls dev_get_drvdata() at "arbitrary runtime" (not probe, not shutdown, not remove):

phy_state_machine() -> ... -> dsa_user_phy_read() -> ds->ops->phy_read() -> lan9303_phy_read() -> chip->ops->phy_read() -> lan9303_mdio_phy_read() -> dev_get_drvdata()

But we never stop the phy_state_machine(), so it may continue to run after dsa_switch_shutdown(). Our common pattern in all DSA drivers is to set drvdata to NULL to suppress the remove() method that may come afterwards. But in this case it will result in an NPD.

The second problem is that the way in which we set dp->conduit->dsa_ptr = NULL; is concurrent with receive packet processing. dsa_switch_rcv() checks once whether dev->dsa_ptr is NULL, but afterwards, rather than continuing to use that non-NULL value, dev->dsa_ptr is dereferenced again and again without NULL checks: dsa_conduit_find_user() and many other places. In between dereferences, there is no locking to ensure that what was valid once continues to be valid.

Both problems have the common aspect that closing the conduit interface solves them.

In the first case, dev_close(conduit) triggers the NETDEV_GOING_DOWN event in dsa_user_netdevice_event() which closes user ports as well. dsa_port_disable_rt() calls phylink_stop(), which synchronously stops the phylink state machine, and ds->ops->phy_read() will thus no longer call into the driver after this point.

In the second case, dev_close(conduit) should do this, as per Documentation/networking/driver.rst:

| Quiescence | ---------- | | After the ndo_stop routine has been called, the hardware must | not receive or transmit any data. All in flight packets must | be aborted. If necessary, poll or wait for completion of | any reset commands.

So it should be sufficient to ensure that later, when we zeroize conduit->dsa_ptr, there will be no concurrent dsa_switch_rcv() call on this conduit.

The addition of the netif_device_detach() function is to ensure that ioctls, rtnetlinks and ethtool requests on the user ports no longer propagate down to the driver - we're no longer prepared to handle them.

The race condition actually did not exist when commit 0650bf52b31f ("net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown") first introduced dsa_switch_shutdown(). It was created later, when we stopped unregistering the user interfaces from a bad spot, and we just replaced that sequence with a racy zeroization of conduit->dsa_ptr (one which doesn't ensure that the interfaces aren't up).

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 19, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4a65d479213fe84ecb14e328271251eebe69492
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab9e90619b6339becc5415647ae154a9a46a044d
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab5d3420a1120950703dbdc33698b28a6ebc3d23
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87bd909a7014e32790e8c759d5b7694a95778ca5
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c24a03a61a245fe34d47582898331fa034b6ccd
Web page

net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e93bf719462ac6d23c881c8b93e5dc9bf5ab7f5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-49998(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(27)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1020.21) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1023.25) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k (6.8.0-1022.25.2) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1044.48) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1025.30~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-edge (5.15.0.1086.95~20.04.1.61) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1081.90~20.04.1) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia (6.8.0-1014.15) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-edge (5.15.0.1077.83~20.04.1) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gkeop-6.8 (6.8.0-1006.8) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual (6.8.0-54.56) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.8.0-1019.23) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1025.30) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.15.0.1076.72) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime (5.15.0.1080.83) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-57.59~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04a (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.135.133) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.136.147~20.04.1) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (5.15.0.1074.77~20.04.1) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt (5.15.0.1033.33) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips (5.15.0.1079.69) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 5.15.176 (fixes >=0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.164-1~deb11u1 (16 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.170-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.170-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (48 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.170-1: fixed in 6.1.170-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.4-1: fixed in 6.11.4-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.4-1: fixed in 6.11.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 214 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3xm8-389p-x4rm · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  23. 2026-10-15 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-15 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3xm8-389p-x4rm · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  25. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-02 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 02:02 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  26. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  27. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  29. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  32. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  33. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  34. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  37. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  38. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  39. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3xm8-389p-x4rm · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  42. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  43. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  44. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  45. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  46. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  47. 2026-09-01 20:27 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  49. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  51. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  52. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  53. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  54. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  55. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  56. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-08-15 22:07 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  69. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-49998?
CVE-2024-49998 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: improve shutdown sequence Alexander Sverdlin presents 2 problems during shutdown with the lan9303 driver. One is specific to lan9303 and the other just happens to reproduce there. The first problem is that lan9303 is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-49998 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-49998 was published on October 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-49998 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-49998 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-49998?
CVE-2024-49998 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-49998?
A fix for CVE-2024-49998 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-49998 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-49998

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-49998?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.