CVE-2024-45003

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-09-04. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-41574 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qv39-hg6q-9r5r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vfs: Don't evict inode under the inode lru traversing context

The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that time, other processes will be stuck if they try getting these inodes (See function find_inode_fast), then the reclaiming process destroy the inodes by function dispose_list(). Some filesystems(eg. ext4 with ea_inode feature, ubifs with xattr) may do inode lookup in the inode evicting callback function, if the inode lookup is operated under the inode lru traversing context, deadlock problems may happen.

Case 1: In function ext4_evict_inode(), the ea inode lookup could happen if ea_inode feature is enabled, the lookup process will be stuck under the evicting context like this:

  • File A has inode i_reg and an ea inode i_ea
  • getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // i_ea is added into lru // lru->i_ea
  • Then, following three processes running like this:

PA PB echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // i_reg is added into lru, lru->i_ea->i_reg prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(i_reg) spin_unlock(&i_reg->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file A i_reg->nlink = 0 iput(i_reg) // i_reg->nlink is 0, do evict ext4_evict_inode ext4_xattr_delete_inode ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all ext4_xattr_inode_iget ext4_iget(i_ea->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(i_ea) ----→ AA deadlock dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&i_ea->i_state)

Case 2: In deleted inode writing function ubifs_jnl_write_inode(), file deleting process holds BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex while getting the xattr inode, which could race with inode reclaiming process(The reclaiming process could try locking BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex in inode evicting function), then an ABBA deadlock problem would happen as following:

  • File A has inode ia and a xattr(with inode ixa), regular file B has
inode ib and a xattr.
  • getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // ixa is added into lru // lru->ixa
  • Then, following three processes running like this:

PA PB PC echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // ib and ia are added into lru, lru->ixa->ib->ia prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate ixa->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(ib) spin_unlock(&ib->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file B ib->nlink = 0 rm file A iput(ia) ubifs_evict_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_write_inode(ia) make_reservation(BASEHD) // Lock wbuf->io_mutex ubifs_iget(ixa->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(ixa) | iput(ib) // ib->nlink is 0, do evict | ubifs_evict_inode | ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ib) ↓ ubifs_jnl_write_inode ABBA deadlock ←-----make_reservation(BASEHD) dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&ixa->i_state)

Fix the possible deadlock by using new inode state flag I_LRU_ISOLATING to pin the inode in memory while inode_lru_isolate( ---truncated---

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 4, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-45003(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(17)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (43 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.226-1: fixed in 5.10.226-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (29 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.112-1: fixed in 6.1.112-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.10.7-1: fixed in 6.10.7-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.10.7-1: fixed in 6.10.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 207 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 111 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-24 05:12 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-24 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv39-hg6q-9r5r · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  16. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 07:00 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 00:03 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  26. 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  28. 2026-09-20 08:13 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  30. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  33. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  34. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  35. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  38. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  39. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  40. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  41. 2026-09-05 15:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  43. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 11:36 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  47. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  48. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  49. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  50. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  51. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  52. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-08-15 11:07 UTCOSV refresh
  58. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  61. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  71. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-45003?
CVE-2024-45003 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 4, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vfs: Don't evict inode under the inode lru traversing context The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that time, other processes will…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-45003 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-45003 was published on September 4, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-45003 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-45003 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-45003?
CVE-2024-45003 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-45003?
A fix for CVE-2024-45003 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-45003 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-45003

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-45003?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.