In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: core: Fix deadlock during RTC update
There is a deadlock when runtime suspend waits for the flush of RTC work,
and the RTC work calls ufshcd_rpm_get_sync() to wait for runtime resume.
Here is deadlock backtrace:
kworker/0:1 D 4892.876354 10 10971 4859 0x4208060 0x8 10 0 120 670730152367
ptr f0ffff80c2e40000 0 1 0x00000001 0x000000ff 0x000000ff 0x000000ff
__switch_to+0x1a8/0x2d4
__schedule+0x684/0xa98
schedule+0x48/0xc8
schedule_timeout+0x48/0x170
do_wait_for_common+0x108/0x1b0
wait_for_completion+0x44/0x60
__flush_work+0x39c/0x424
__cancel_work_sync+0xd8/0x208
cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x14/0x28
__ufshcd_wl_suspend+0x19c/0x480
ufshcd_wl_runtime_suspend+0x3c/0x1d4
scsi_runtime_suspend+0x78/0xc8
__rpm_callback+0x94/0x3e0
rpm_suspend+0x2d4/0x65c
__pm_runtime_suspend+0x80/0x114
scsi_runtime_idle+0x38/0x6c
rpm_idle+0x264/0x338
__pm_runtime_idle+0x80/0x110
ufshcd_rtc_work+0x128/0x1e4
process_one_work+0x26c/0x650
worker_thread+0x260/0x3d8
kthread+0x110/0x134
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Skip updating RTC if RPM state is not RPM_ACTIVE.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it