CVE-2024-26991

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86/mmu: x86: Don't overflow lpage_info when checking attributes

Fix KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES to not overflow lpage_info array and trigger KASAN splat, as seen in the private_mem_conversions_test selftest.

When memory attributes are set on a GFN range, that range will have specific properties applied to the TDP. A huge page cannot be used when the attributes are inconsistent, so they are disabled for those the specific huge pages. For internal KVM reasons, huge pages are also not allowed to span adjacent memslots regardless of whether the backing memory could be mapped as huge.

What GFNs support which huge page sizes is tracked by an array of arrays 'lpage_info' on the memslot, of ‘kvm_lpage_info’ structs. Each index of lpage_info contains a vmalloc allocated array of these for a specific supported page size. The kvm_lpage_info denotes whether a specific huge page (GFN and page size) on the memslot is supported. These arrays include indices for unaligned head and tail huge pages.

Preventing huge pages from spanning adjacent memslot is covered by incrementing the count in head and tail kvm_lpage_info when the memslot is allocated, but disallowing huge pages for memory that has mixed attributes has to be done in a more complicated way. During the KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES ioctl KVM updates lpage_info for each memslot in the range that has mismatched attributes. KVM does this a memslot at a time, and marks a special bit, KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG, in the kvm_lpage_info for any huge page. This bit is essentially a permanently elevated count. So huge pages will not be mapped for the GFN at that page size if the count is elevated in either case: a huge head or tail page unaligned to the memslot or if KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG is set because it has mixed attributes.

To determine whether a huge page has consistent attributes, the KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES operation checks an xarray to make sure it consistently has the incoming attribute. Since level - 1 huge pages are aligned to level huge pages, it employs an optimization. As long as the level - 1 huge pages are checked first, it can just check these and assume that if each level - 1 huge page contained within the level sized huge page is not mixed, then the level size huge page is not mixed. This optimization happens in the helper hugepage_has_attrs().

Unfortunately, although the kvm_lpage_info array representing page size 'level' will contain an entry for an unaligned tail page of size level, the array for level - 1 will not contain an entry for each GFN at page size level. The level - 1 array will only contain an index for any unaligned region covered by level - 1 huge page size, which can be a smaller region. So this causes the optimization to overflow the level - 1 kvm_lpage_info and perform a vmalloc out of bounds read.

In some cases of head and tail pages where an overflow could happen, callers skip the operation completely as KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG is not required to prevent huge pages as discussed earlier. But for memslots that are smaller than the 1GB page size, it does call hugepage_has_attrs(). In this case the huge page is both the head and tail page. The issue can be observed simply by compiling the kernel with CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC and running the selftest “private_mem_conversions_test”, which produces the output like the following:

BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in hugepage_has_attrs+0x7e/0x110 Read of size 4 at addr ffffc900000a3008 by task private_mem_con/169 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl print_report ? __virt_addr_valid ? hugepage_has_attrs ? hugepage_has_attrs kasan_report ? hugepage_has_attrs hugepage_has_attrs kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes kvm_vm_ioctl

It is a little ambiguous whether the unaligned head page (in the bug case also the tail page) should be expected to have KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG set. It is not functionally required, as the unal ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
13.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-26991(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-64k (6.8.0-1009.9) @ noble2026-05-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.8.0-1008.8) @ noble2026-05-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws (6.8.0-1011.12) @ noble2026-05-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.8.0-38.38) @ noble2026-05-24ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.37.1.el9_42024-09-24redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.8.8osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 109 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-14 12:55 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-26 13:37 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-26991?
CVE-2024-26991 is a medium vulnerability published on May 1, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: x86: Don't overflow lpage_info when checking attributes Fix KVMSETMEMORYATTRIBUTES to not overflow lpageinfo array and trigger KASAN splat, as seen in the privatememconversions_test selftest. When memory attributes…
When was CVE-2024-26991 disclosed?
CVE-2024-26991 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2024, with the most recent update on November 4, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-26991 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-26991 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 13.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-26991?
CVE-2024-26991 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-26991?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-26991, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-26991

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-26991?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.