CVE-2024-26991

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-24253 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p437-j6g9-3f2f (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86/mmu: x86: Don't overflow lpage_info when checking attributes

Fix KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES to not overflow lpage_info array and trigger KASAN splat, as seen in the private_mem_conversions_test selftest.

When memory attributes are set on a GFN range, that range will have specific properties applied to the TDP. A huge page cannot be used when the attributes are inconsistent, so they are disabled for those the specific huge pages. For internal KVM reasons, huge pages are also not allowed to span adjacent memslots regardless of whether the backing memory could be mapped as huge.

What GFNs support which huge page sizes is tracked by an array of arrays 'lpage_info' on the memslot, of ‘kvm_lpage_info’ structs. Each index of lpage_info contains a vmalloc allocated array of these for a specific supported page size. The kvm_lpage_info denotes whether a specific huge page (GFN and page size) on the memslot is supported. These arrays include indices for unaligned head and tail huge pages.

Preventing huge pages from spanning adjacent memslot is covered by incrementing the count in head and tail kvm_lpage_info when the memslot is allocated, but disallowing huge pages for memory that has mixed attributes has to be done in a more complicated way. During the KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES ioctl KVM updates lpage_info for each memslot in the range that has mismatched attributes. KVM does this a memslot at a time, and marks a special bit, KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG, in the kvm_lpage_info for any huge page. This bit is essentially a permanently elevated count. So huge pages will not be mapped for the GFN at that page size if the count is elevated in either case: a huge head or tail page unaligned to the memslot or if KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG is set because it has mixed attributes.

To determine whether a huge page has consistent attributes, the KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES operation checks an xarray to make sure it consistently has the incoming attribute. Since level - 1 huge pages are aligned to level huge pages, it employs an optimization. As long as the level - 1 huge pages are checked first, it can just check these and assume that if each level - 1 huge page contained within the level sized huge page is not mixed, then the level size huge page is not mixed. This optimization happens in the helper hugepage_has_attrs().

Unfortunately, although the kvm_lpage_info array representing page size 'level' will contain an entry for an unaligned tail page of size level, the array for level - 1 will not contain an entry for each GFN at page size level. The level - 1 array will only contain an index for any unaligned region covered by level - 1 huge page size, which can be a smaller region. So this causes the optimization to overflow the level - 1 kvm_lpage_info and perform a vmalloc out of bounds read.

In some cases of head and tail pages where an overflow could happen, callers skip the operation completely as KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG is not required to prevent huge pages as discussed earlier. But for memslots that are smaller than the 1GB page size, it does call hugepage_has_attrs(). In this case the huge page is both the head and tail page. The issue can be observed simply by compiling the kernel with CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC and running the selftest “private_mem_conversions_test”, which produces the output like the following:

BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in hugepage_has_attrs+0x7e/0x110 Read of size 4 at addr ffffc900000a3008 by task private_mem_con/169 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl print_report ? __virt_addr_valid ? hugepage_has_attrs ? hugepage_has_attrs kasan_report ? hugepage_has_attrs hugepage_has_attrs kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes kvm_vm_ioctl

It is a little ambiguous whether the unaligned head page (in the bug case also the tail page) should be expected to have KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG set. It is not functionally required, as the unal ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 1, 2024

Last Modified

November 4, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-26991(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-64k (6.8.0-1009.9) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.8.0-1008.8) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws (6.8.0-1011.12) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.8.0-38.38) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.37.1.el9_42024-09-24redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.8.8 (fixes >=6.8.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.8.9-1: fixed in 6.8.9-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.8.9-1: fixed in 6.8.9-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 211 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 114 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-24 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p437-j6g9-3f2f · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 11:14 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-09-30 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-09-21 23:16 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  27. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  28. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  29. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  32. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  33. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  34. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  35. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  36. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  38. 2026-09-02 19:08 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  40. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  42. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  43. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  44. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  45. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  46. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  47. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  48. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  49. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  50. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  51. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  52. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  53. 2026-08-16 11:38 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  55. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  56. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  57. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  58. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  59. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  60. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  61. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  62. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  63. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  64. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  65. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  66. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  67. 2026-08-01 06:06 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  69. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  70. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  71. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  72. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-26991?
CVE-2024-26991 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 1, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: x86: Don't overflow lpage_info when checking attributes Fix KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES to not overflow lpage_info array and trigger KASAN splat, as seen in the private_mem_conversions_test selftest. When memory…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-26991 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-26991 was published on May 1, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 4, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-26991 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-26991 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-26991?
CVE-2024-26991 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-26991?
A fix for CVE-2024-26991 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-26991 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-26991

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-26991?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.