Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. The Argo CD API prior to versions 2.10-rc2, 2.9.4, 2.8.8, and 2.7.15 are vulnerable to a cross-server request forgery (CSRF) attack when the attacker has the ability to write HTML to a page on the same parent domain as Argo CD. A CSRF attack works by tricking an authenticated Argo CD user into loading a web page which contains code to call Argo CD API endpoints on the victim’s behalf. For example, an attacker could send an Argo CD user a link to a page which looks harmless but in the background calls an Argo CD API endpoint to create an application running malicious code. Argo CD uses the “Lax” SameSite cookie policy to prevent CSRF attacks where the attacker controls an external domain. The malicious external website can attempt to call the Argo CD API, but the web browser will refuse to send the Argo CD auth token with the request. Many companies host Argo CD on an internal subdomain. If an attacker can place malicious code on, for example, https://test.internal.example.com/, they can still perform a CSRF attack. In this case, the “Lax” SameSite cookie does not prevent the browser from sending the auth cookie, because the destination is a parent domain of the Argo CD API. Browsers generally block such attacks by applying CORS policies to sensitive requests with sensitive content types. Specifically, browsers will send a “preflight request” for POSTs with content type “application/json” asking the destination API “are you allowed to accept requests from my domain?” If the destination API does not answer “yes,” the browser will block the request. Before the patched versions, Argo CD did not validate that requests contained the correct content type header. So an attacker could bypass the browser’s CORS check by setting the content type to something which is considered “not sensitive” such as “text/plain.” The browser wouldn’t send the preflight request, and Argo CD would happily accept the contents (which are actually still JSON) and perform the requested action (such as running malicious code). A patch for this vulnerability has been released in the following Argo CD versions: 2.10-rc2, 2.9.4, 2.8.8, and 2.7.15. The patch contains a breaking API change. The Argo CD API will no longer accept non-GET requests which do not specify application/json as their Content-Type. The accepted content types list is configurable, and it is possible (but discouraged) to disable the content type check completely. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
CVE-2024-22424
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 8.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-01-19. NVD baseline CVSS 8.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2024-0307 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-92mw-q256-5vwg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.3
- EG Score
- 8.3HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 53EG Risk 53/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity83% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 41st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.3 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
January 19, 2024
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 6, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in github.com/argoproj/argo-cd · Advisory · argoproj/argo-cd · GitHub
https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/security/advisories/GHSA-92mw-q256-5vwgfix: enforce content type header for API requests
Fix merged in argoproj/argo-cd PR #16860 on 2024-01-16 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/pull/16860ArgoCD does not provide CSRF protection · Issue #2496 · argoproj/argo-cd · GitHub
https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/issues/2496Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-22424(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2024:0692Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.10.2 security update
- RHSA-2024:0691Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.9.4 security update
- RHSA-2024:0689Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Errata Advisory for Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.11.1 security update
Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openshift-gitops-1/must-gather-rhel8:v1.11.1-1 | 2024-02-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-gitops-1/must-gather-rhel8:v1.9.4-1 | 2024-02-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-gitops-1/must-gather-rhel8:v1.10.2-2 | 2024-02-05 | redhat |
| go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 @ 2.7.16 (fixes < 2.7.16) | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 @ 2.8.8 (fixes >= 2.8.0-rc1, < 2.8.8) | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 @ 2.9.4 (fixes >= 2.9.0-rc1, < 2.9.4) | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 @ 2.10-rc2 (fixes = 2.10.0-rc1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | — |
| — |
| github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 | 2.10.0-rc1 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 212 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-92mw-q256-5vwg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.3
- 2026-11-01 08:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-28 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-20 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-12 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-12 04:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-11 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-22 10:15 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-03 07:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-16 20:56 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-01 14:36 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:github.com/argoproj/argo-cd
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-22424?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-22424 published?
Is CVE-2024-22424 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-22424?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-22424?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-22424
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-22424?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.