CVE-2023-54251

NONECVSS 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: —Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: taprio: Limit TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_SCHED_CYCLE_TIME to INT_MAX.

syzkaller found zero division error [0] in div_s64_rem() called from get_cycle_time_elapsed(), where sched->cycle_time is the divisor.

We have tests in parse_taprio_schedule() so that cycle_time will never be 0, and actually cycle_time is not 0 in get_cycle_time_elapsed().

The problem is that the types of divisor are different; cycle_time is s64, but the argument of div_s64_rem() is s32.

syzkaller fed this input and 0x100000000 is cast to s32 to be 0.

@TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_SCHED_CYCLE_TIME={0xc, 0x8, 0x100000000}

We use s64 for cycle_time to cast it to ktime_t, so let's keep it and set max for cycle_time.

While at it, we prevent overflow in setup_txtime() and add another test in parse_taprio_schedule() to check if cycle_time overflows.

Also, we add a new tdc test case for this issue.

[0]: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 103 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-00330-g60cc1f7d0605 #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work RIP: 0010:div_s64_rem include/linux/math64.h:42 [inline] RIP: 0010:get_cycle_time_elapsed net/sched/sch_taprio.c:223 [inline] RIP: 0010:find_entry_to_transmit+0x252/0x7e0 net/sched/sch_taprio.c:344 Code: 3c 02 00 0f 85 5e 05 00 00 48 8b 4c 24 08 4d 8b bd 40 01 00 00 48 8b 7c 24 48 48 89 c8 4c 29 f8 48 63 f7 48 99 48 89 74 24 70 <48> f7 fe 48 29 d1 48 8d 04 0f 49 89 cc 48 89 44 24 20 49 8d 85 10 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000acf260 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 177450e0347560cf RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 177450e0347560cf RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000100000000 RBP: 0000000000000056 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed10020a0934 R10: ffff8880105049a7 R11: ffff88806cf3a520 R12: ffff888010504800 R13: ffff88800c00d800 R14: ffff8880105049a0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88806cf00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f0edf84f0e8 CR3: 000000000d73c002 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: get_packet_txtime net/sched/sch_taprio.c:508 [inline] taprio_enqueue_one+0x900/0xff0 net/sched/sch_taprio.c:577 taprio_enqueue+0x378/0xae0 net/sched/sch_taprio.c:658 dev_qdisc_enqueue+0x46/0x170 net/core/dev.c:3732 __dev_xmit_skb net/core/dev.c:3821 [inline] __dev_queue_xmit+0x1b2f/0x3000 net/core/dev.c:4169 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3088 [inline] neigh_resolve_output net/core/neighbour.c:1552 [inline] neigh_resolve_output+0x4a7/0x780 net/core/neighbour.c:1532 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:544 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0x924/0x17d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:135 __ip6_finish_output+0x620/0xaa0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:196 ip6_finish_output net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:207 [inline] NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:292 [inline] ip6_output+0x206/0x410 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:228 dst_output include/net/dst.h:458 [inline] NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0xea/0x260 include/linux/netfilter.h:303 ndisc_send_skb+0x872/0xe80 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:508 ndisc_send_ns+0xb5/0x130 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:666 addrconf_dad_work+0xc14/0x13f0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:4175 process_one_work+0x92c/0x13a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2597 worker_thread+0x60f/0x1240 kernel/workqueue.c:2748 kthread+0x2fe/0x3f0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 Modules linked in:

CVSS v3
—
EG Score
0.0(none)
EG Risk
0
EG Risk 0/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. It is distinct from the 0–10 EG Score, which measures severity.

EPSS
6.4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 30, 2025

Last Modified

April 15, 2026

References (4)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-54251(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.88.1.el9_22024-10-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.13.1.el9_42024-04-30redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.126—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 115 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 21:17 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 07:31 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 21:11 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-22 21:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-21 01:40 UTCEG score recompute

Related CVEs(same product + same vendor)

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2023-54251?
CVE-2023-54251 is a none vulnerability published on December 30, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: taprio: Limit TCATAPRIOATTRSCHEDCYCLETIME to INTMAX. syzkaller found zero division error [0] in divs64rem() called from getcycletimeelapsed(), where sched->cycletime is the divisor. We have tests in parsetaprioschedule()…
When was CVE-2023-54251 disclosed?
CVE-2023-54251 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 30, 2025, with the most recent update on April 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-54251 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-54251 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 6.4% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2023-54251?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-54251, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-54251

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-54251?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs