In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/gfx: disable gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq only when enabling legacy gfx ras
gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq is only enabled when legacy gfx ras is assert.
So in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini, interrupt disablement for cp_ecc_error_irq
should be executed under such condition, otherwise, an amdgpu_irq_put
calltrace will occur.
[ 7283.170322] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_irq_put+0x45/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 7283.170964] RSP: 0018:ffff9a5fc3967d00 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 7283.170967] RAX: ffff98d88afd3040 RBX: ffff98d89da20000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 7283.170969] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff98d89da2bef8 RDI: ffff98d89da20000
[ 7283.170971] RBP: ffff98d89da20000 R08: ffff98d89da2ca18 R09: 0000000000000006
[ 7283.170973] R10: ffffd5764243c008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001050
[ 7283.170975] R13: ffff98d89da38978 R14: ffffffff999ae15a R15: ffff98d880130105
[ 7283.170978] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98d996f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 7283.170981] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 7283.170983] CR2: 00000000f7a9d178 CR3: 00000001c42ea000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
[ 7283.170986] Call Trace:
[ 7283.170988]
[ 7283.170989] gfx_v9_0_hw_fini+0x1c/0x6d0 [amdgpu]
[ 7283.171655] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x101/0x1a0 [amdgpu]
[ 7283.172245] amdgpu_device_suspend+0x103/0x180 [amdgpu]
[ 7283.172823] amdgpu_pmops_freeze+0x21/0x60 [amdgpu]
[ 7283.173412] pci_pm_freeze+0x54/0xc0
[ 7283.173419] ? __pfx_pci_pm_freeze+0x10/0x10
[ 7283.173425] dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x200
[ 7283.173430] __device_suspend+0x164/0x5f0
v2: drop gfx11 as it's fixed in a different solution by retiring cp_ecc_irq funcs(Hawking)
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it