CVE-2023-48022

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-11-28. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekWeaponized

Also known asEUVD-2023-52111 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 84%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 84%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Anyscale Ray 2.6.3 and 2.8.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the job submission API. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this report is irrelevant because Ray, as stated in its documentation, is not intended for use outside of a strictly controlled network environment. (Also, within that environment, customers at version 2.52.0 and later can choose to use token authentication.)

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
93
EG Risk 93/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation84% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
84%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
84% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 28, 2023

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

The story of ShadowRay (CVE-2023-48022) - vsociety

https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/the-story-of-shadowray-cve-2023-48022
Web page

ShadowRay (CVE-2023-48022) - exploit - vsociety

https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/shadowray-cve-2023-48022-exploit
Web page

Ray, Versions 2.6.3, 2.8.0 | Bishop Fox

https://bishopfox.com/blog/ray-versions-2-6-3-2-8-0
Web page

Ray token authentication — Ray 2.59.0

https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/ray-security/token-auth.html

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17721605932026-02-27redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17721606252026-02-27redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.2.2-17653790882025-12-10redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.2.2-17653790492025-12-10redhat
redhatrhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:3.2.2-17648717962025-12-10redhat
pipray—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ray0.1.1 ... 2.9.3 (116 versions)
  • every version through 2.49.2: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 174 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 76 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-31 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-31 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-30 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-10-30 00:30 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-30 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-30 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-29 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-28 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-28 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-28 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 06:34 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-27 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-27 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-26 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-26 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-25 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-25 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-25 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-24 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-24 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-23 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-23 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-22 12:56 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-22 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-22 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-21 14:59 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-21 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-20 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-20 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-19 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-19 17:53 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-19 17:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-18 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-18 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-18 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-18 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-17 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-17 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-17 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-16 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-16 23:57 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-16 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-15 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-15 20:51 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-15 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-10-14 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-14 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-14 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-13 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-13 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-13 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-12 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-12 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-12 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-12 14:24 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-10-11 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  60. 2026-09-22 15:22 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-09-21 20:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  63. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-09-17 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/ray_agent_job_rce✓ verified
    Published Aug 23, 2024

    Ray Agent Job RCE

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2023/CVE-2023-48022.yaml
    Published Jun 23, 2025

    Anyscale Ray - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjakabakos/ShadowRay-RCE-PoC-CVE-2023-48022
    Published Mar 29, 2024

    ShadowRay RCE POC (CVE-2023-48022)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0x656565/CVE-2023-48022
    Published Jan 10, 2024

    CVE-2023-48022 exploit modified from Bishop Fox work

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-48022?
CVE-2023-48022 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 28, 2023. Anyscale Ray 2.6.3 and 2.8.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the job submission API. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this report is irrelevant because Ray, as stated in its documentation, is not intended for use outside of a strictly controlled network environment. (Also,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-48022 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-48022 was published on November 28, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-48022 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-48022 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 84% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-48022?
CVE-2023-48022 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-48022?
A fix for CVE-2023-48022 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-48022 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-48022

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-48022?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.