In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dp: populate connector of struct dp_panel
DP CTS test case 4.2.2.6 has valid edid with bad checksum on purpose
and expect DP source return correct checksum. During drm edid read,
correct edid checksum is calculated and stored at
connector::real_edid_checksum.
The problem is struct dp_panel::connector never be assigned, instead the
connector is stored in struct msm_dp::connector. When we run compliance
testing test case 4.2.2.6 dp_panel_handle_sink_request() won't have a valid
edid set in struct dp_panel::edid so we'll try to use the connectors
real_edid_checksum and hit a NULL pointer dereference error because the
connector pointer is never assigned.
Changes in V2:
-- populate panel connector at msm_dp_modeset_init() instead of at dp_panel_read_sink_caps()
Changes in V3:
-- remove unhelpful kernel crash trace commit text
-- remove renaming dp_display parameter to dp
Changes in V4:
-- add more details to commit text
Changes in v10:
-- group into one series
Changes in v11:
-- drop drm/msm/dp: dp_link_parse_sink_count() return immediately if aux read
Signee-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it