CVE-2022-49215

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-03-18. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-55011 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8r49-fwcv-vhr4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xsk: Fix race at socket teardown

Fix a race in the xsk socket teardown code that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference splat. The current xsk unbind code in xsk_unbind_dev() starts by setting xs->state to XSK_UNBOUND, sets xs->dev to NULL and then waits for any NAPI processing to terminate using synchronize_net(). After that, the release code starts to tear down the socket state and free allocated memory.

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000c0 PGD 8000000932469067 P4D 8000000932469067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 25 PID: 69132 Comm: grpcpp_sync_ser Tainted: G I 5.16.0+ #2 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0599V5, BIOS 1.2.10 03/09/2015 RIP: 0010:__xsk_sendmsg+0x2c/0x690 [...] RSP: 0018:ffffa2348bd13d50 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000040 RCX: ffff8d5fc632d258 RDX: 0000000000400000 RSI: ffffa2348bd13e10 RDI: ffff8d5fc5489800 RBP: ffffa2348bd13db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffffffff000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8d5fc5489800 R13: ffff8d5fcb0f5140 R14: ffff8d5fcb0f5140 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f991cff9400(0000) GS:ffff8d6f1f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000c0 CR3: 0000000114888005 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: ? aa_sk_perm+0x43/0x1b0 xsk_sendmsg+0xf0/0x110 sock_sendmsg+0x65/0x70 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x190 ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x23/0x50 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xa5/0x1d0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x29/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

There are two problems with the current code. First, setting xs->dev to NULL before waiting for all users to stop using the socket is not correct. The entry to the data plane functions xsk_poll(), xsk_sendmsg(), and xsk_recvmsg() are all guarded by a test that xs->state is in the state XSK_BOUND and if not, it returns right away. But one process might have passed this test but still have not gotten to the point in which it uses xs->dev in the code. In this interim, a second process executing xsk_unbind_dev() might have set xs->dev to NULL which will lead to a crash for the first process. The solution here is just to get rid of this NULL assignment since it is not used anymore. Before commit 42fddcc7c64b ("xsk: use state member for socket synchronization"), xs->dev was the gatekeeper to admit processes into the data plane functions, but it was replaced with the state variable xs->state in the aforementioned commit.

The second problem is that synchronize_net() does not wait for any process in xsk_poll(), xsk_sendmsg(), or xsk_recvmsg() to complete, which means that the state they rely on might be cleaned up prematurely. This can happen when the notifier gets called (at driver unload for example) as it uses xsk_unbind_dev(). Solve this by extending the RCU critical region from just the ndo_xsk_wakeup to the whole functions mentioned above, so that both the test of xs->state == XSK_BOUND and the last use of any member of xs is covered by the RCU critical section. This will guarantee that when synchronize_net() completes, there will be no processes left executing xsk_poll(), xsk_sendmsg(), or xsk_recvmsg() and state can be cleaned up safely. Note that we need to drop the RCU lock for the skb xmit path as it uses functions that might sleep. Due to this, we have to retest the xs->state after we grab the mutex that protects the skb xmit code from, among a number of things, an xsk_unbind_dev() being executed from the notifier at the same time.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
10th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 26, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49215(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-162.6.1.el9_12022-11-15redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.33 (fixes >=5.4.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (498 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 5.17.3-1: fixed in 5.17.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 196 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 98 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8r49-fwcv-vhr4 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  14. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-10-18 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-12 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-10-11 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-26 19:03 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  24. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  26. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-09-07 04:48 UTCOSV refresh
  31. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  43. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  44. 2026-08-20 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  46. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  47. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  49. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  50. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  51. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  53. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  55. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  57. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-05 09:35 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-05 09:35 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-05 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8r49-fwcv-vhr4 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  61. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  62. 2026-08-04 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-04 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-04 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8r49-fwcv-vhr4 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  65. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-08-04 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-04 09:47 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-04 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8r49-fwcv-vhr4 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  69. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  71. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  72. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  73. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49215?
CVE-2022-49215 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 26, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xsk: Fix race at socket teardown Fix a race in the xsk socket teardown code that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference splat. The current xsk unbind code in xsk_unbind_dev() starts by setting xs->state to XSK_UNBOUND, sets xs->dev…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49215 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49215 was published on February 26, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49215 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49215 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49215?
CVE-2022-49215 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49215?
A fix for CVE-2022-49215 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49215 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49215

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49215?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.