Cranelift is an open-source code generator maintained by Bytecode Alliance. It translates a target-independent intermediate representation into executable machine code. There is a bug in 0.73 of the Cranelift x64 backend that can create a scenario that could result in a potential sandbox escape in a Wasm program. This bug was introduced in the new backend on 2020-09-08 and first included in a release on 2020-09-30, but the new backend was not the default prior to 0.73. The recently-released version 0.73 with default settings, and prior versions with an explicit build flag to select the new backend, are vulnerable. The bug in question performs a sign-extend instead of a zero-extend on a value loaded from the stack, under a specific set of circumstances. If those circumstances occur, the bug could allow access to memory addresses upto 2GiB before the start of the Wasm program heap. If the heap bound is larger than 2GiB, then it would be possible to read memory from a computable range dependent on the size of the heaps bound. The impact of this bug is highly dependent on heap implementation, specifically: * if the heap has bounds checks, and * does not rely exclusively on guard pages, and * the heap bound is 2GiB or smaller * then this bug cannot be used to reach memory from another Wasm program heap. The impact of the vulnerability is mitigated if there is no memory mapped in the range accessible using this bug, for example, if there is a 2 GiB guard region before the Wasm program heap. The bug in question performs a sign-extend instead of a zero-extend on a value loaded from the stack, when the register allocator reloads a spilled integer value narrower than 64 bits. This interacts poorly with another optimization: the instruction selector elides a 32-to-64-bit zero-extend operator when we know that an instruction producing a 32-bit value actually zeros the upper 32 bits of its destination register. Hence, we rely on these zeroed bits, but the type of the value is still i32, and the spill/reload reconstitutes those bits as the sign extension of the i32’s MSB. The issue would thus occur when: * An i32 value in a Wasm program is greater than or equal to 0x8000_0000; * The value is spilled and reloaded by the register allocator due to high register pressure in the program between the value’s definition and its use; * The value is produced by an instruction that we know to be “special” in that it zeroes the upper 32 bits of its destination: add, sub, mul, and, or; * The value is then zero-extended to 64 bits in the Wasm program; * The resulting 64-bit value is used. Under these circumstances there is a potential sandbox escape when the i32 value is a pointer. The usual code emitted for heap accesses zero-extends the Wasm heap address, adds it to a 64-bit heap base, and accesses the resulting address. If the zero-extend becomes a sign-extend, the program could reach backward and access memory up to 2GiB before the start of its heap. In addition to assessing the nature of the code generation bug in Cranelift, we have also determined that under specific circumstances, both Lucet and Wasmtime using this version of Cranelift may be exploitable. See referenced GitHub Advisory for more details.
CVE-2021-32629
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2021-08-25. NVD baseline CVSS 7.2; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2021-0466 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hpqh-2wqx-7qp5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.2
- EG Score
- 7.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity72% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 39th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 24, 2021
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (4)
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://crates.io/crates/cranelift-codegenProduct · Third Party Advisory
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commit/95559c01aaa7c061088a433040f31e8291fb09d0Patch · Third Party Advisory
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hpqh-2wqx-7qp5Exploit · Third Party Advisory
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://www.fastly.com/security-advisories/memory-access-due-to-code-generation-flaw-in-cranelift-moduleThird Party Advisory
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pip | wasmtime @ 0.27.0 (fixes >= 0, < 0.27.0) | — | ghsa |
| rust | cranelift-codegen @ 0.73.1 (fixes < 0.73.1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| cranelift-codegen | — |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wasmtime | 0.0.1 ... 0.9.0 (21 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 212 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 118 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hpqh-2wqx-7qp5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.2
- 2026-11-01 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-28 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-25 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-21 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-18 14:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-18 09:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-26 01:12 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 16:01 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-01 03:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-20 02:15 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 showncrates.io:cranelift-codegen · PyPI:wasmtime
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-32629?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-32629 published?
Is CVE-2021-32629 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-32629?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-32629?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-32629
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-32629?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.