Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely.
CVE-2021-3177
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-24. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2021-26520 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 24%
- EPSS %ILE
- 97th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 24% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
January 19, 2021
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: python3.10-3.10.0~a5-1.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FPE7SMXYUIWPOIZV4DQYXODRXMFX3C5E/[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: python37-3.7.10-1.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FONHJIOZOFD7CD35KZL6SVBUTMBPGZGA/[SECURITY] Fedora 33 Update: mingw-python3-3.9.1-2.fc33 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCFZMVRQUKCBQIG5F2CBVADK63NFSE4A/[SECURITY] Fedora 32 Update: mingw-python3-3.8.3-8.fc32 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRHOCQYX3QLDGDQGTWQAUUT2GGIZCZUO/[SECURITY] [DLA 3432-1] python2.7 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00024.html[SECURITY] [DLA 2919-1] python2.7 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/02/msg00013.html[SECURITY] [DLA 2619-1] python3.5 security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/04/msg00005.htmlPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3Ecloses bpo-42938: Replace snprintf with Python unicode formatting in ctypes param reprs.
Fix merged in python/cpython PR #24239 on 2021-01-18 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24239Issue 42938: [security][CVE-2021-3177] ctypes double representation BoF - Python tracker
https://bugs.python.org/issue42938Vendor Advisories for CVE-2021-3177(6)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2022:5235Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: python security update
- GHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwhGitHub Security AdvisoriesCritical
Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may...
- RHSA-2021:3252Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: python27 security update
- RHSA-2021:3254Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: rh-python38 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2021:1633Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: python3 security update
- CVE-2021-3177Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)
Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely.
Patch Availability(11)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python2.7-minimal (2.7.6-8ubuntu0.6+esm10) @ trusty | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | python3.8-venv (3.8.5-1~20.04.2) @ focal | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | python3.9-venv (3.9.5-3ubuntu0~20.04.1+esm2) @ focal | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | python2.7-minimal (2.7.12-1ubuntu0~16.04.18) @ xenial | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | python2.7-minimal (2.7.18-1~20.04.1) @ focal | 2026-10-29 | ubuntu |
| redhat | python-0:2.7.5-92.el7_9 | 2022-06-28 | redhat |
| redhat | python27-python-pygments-0:1.5-5.el7 | 2021-08-24 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-python38-python-urllib3-0:1.25.7-7.el7 | 2021-08-24 | redhat |
| redhat | python38:3.8-8040020210128125034.b1b639b6 | 2021-05-18 | redhat |
| redhat | python3-0:3.6.8-37.el8 | 2021-05-18 | redhat |
| redhat | python27:2.7-8040020210122160212.cdb2db54 | 2021-05-18 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(20 across 18 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python2.7 | — |
| — |
| python3.9 | — |
| — |
Debian:9(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python2.7 | 2.7.13-2 ... 2.7.13-2+deb9u5 (6 versions) |
| — |
| python3.5 | 3.5.3-1, 3.5.3-1+deb9u1, 3.5.3-1+deb9u2, 3.5.3-1+deb9u3 |
| — |
Alpine:v3.10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.15(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.16(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.17(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.18(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python3 | — |
| — |
Debian:10(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python2.7 | 2.7.16-2, 2.7.16-2+deb10u1 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1761MODERATE2021-01-19
RHSA-2021:1761 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2021:1879MODERATE2021-01-19
RHSA-2021:1879 — Moderate
- UbuntuUSN-4754-1MEDIUM
Python vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-4754-3MEDIUM
Python vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-4754-4MEDIUM
Python 2.7 vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-4754-5MEDIUM
Python vulnerability
- UbuntuUSN-6891-1MEDIUM
Python vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 92× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 263 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 163 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-31 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-30 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 05:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-29 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-28 05:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-27 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 04:40 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-27 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-24 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-22 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-21 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-20 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-19 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-18 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-18 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-16 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 24% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-14 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hc96-xw56-vfwh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 23% · 97th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.10:python3 · Alpine:v3.12:python3 · Alpine:v3.14:python3
- CVE-2019-5010EG 7.5EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2019-16056EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2019-16935EG 6.1EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-8492EG 6.5EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-20907EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2021-23336NVD 5.9EG 6.5EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-14422EG 5.9EPSS p96MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-8315EG 5.5MEDIUM
- CVE-2022-45061EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2023-40217EG 5.3MEDIUM
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2021:1633 · redhat:RHSA-2021:1761 · redhat:RHSA-2021:3254
- CVE-2020-27619EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-26116EG 7.2EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2021-23336NVD 5.9EG 6.5EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-27783EG 6.1EPSS p90MEDIUM
- CVE-2021-29921EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-42771EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2022-0391EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2019-20907EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-9674EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2019-17514EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-3177?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-3177 published?
Is CVE-2021-3177 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-3177?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-3177?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-3177
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-3177?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.