CVE-2019-5418

CRITICALNVD 7.59.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-07-07), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2019-0375 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 99%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
89
EG Risk 89/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
99%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://web.archive.org/web/20190313201629/https://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2019/3/13/Rails-4-2-5-1-5-1-6-2-have-been-released/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5418

Published

March 27, 2019

Last Modified

October 30, 2025

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 30 Update: rubygem-activemodel-5.2.3-2.fc30 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y43636TH4D6T46IC6N2RQVJTRFJAAYGA/
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 1739-1] rails security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00042.html
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1289
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1149
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1147
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0796
Web page

oss-security - [CVE-2019-5418] Amendment: Possible Remote Code Execution Exploit in Action View

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/22/1

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubunturuby-railties (2:4.2.6-1ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial2026-11-02ubuntu
redhatcfme-gemset-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf2019-05-29redhat
redhatrh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el72019-05-13redhat
redhatrh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el72019-05-13redhat
redhatcfme-gemset-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf2019-04-23redhat
rubygemsactionview @ 5.0.7.2 (fixes >= 5.0.0, <= 5.0.7.1)—ghsa
rubygemsactionview @ 5.2.2.1 (fixes >= 5.2.0, <= 5.2.2.0)—ghsa
rubygemsactionview @ 4.2.11.1 (fixes >= 4.0.0, <= 4.2.11.0)—ghsa
rubygemsactionview @ 5.1.6.2 (fixes >= 5.1.0, <= 5.1.6.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rails—
  • every version up to 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rails—
  • every version up to 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rails—
  • every version up to 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rails—
  • every version up to 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1: fixed in 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rails2:4.1.8-1, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u1, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u2, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u3, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u4
  • every version up to 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u5: fixed in 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u5
—
RubyGems(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
actionview5.0.0 ... 5.0.7.1 (17 versions)
  • 5.2.0 up to 5.2.2.1: fixed in 5.2.2.1
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.2.11.1: fixed in 4.2.11.1
  • 5.1.0 up to 5.1.6.2: fixed in 5.1.6.2
  • 5.0.0 up to 5.0.7.2: fixed in 5.0.7.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 107× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 873 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 773 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-11-01 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-01 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-11-01 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-01 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-30 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-29 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-29 16:56 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-28 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-28 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-26 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-26 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-26 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-25 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-25 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-24 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-24 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-23 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-23 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-21 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-21 10:37 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-20 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-19 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-18 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-16 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-16 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-16 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-15 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-15 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-15 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-14 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-14 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-12 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-12 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-11 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-11 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-11 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-11 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-10 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-10 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-10 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-10 10:04 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-10 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-10 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-09 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-09 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-09 12:01 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-09 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-09 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-08 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-08 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-08 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-08 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-08 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-08 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-07 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-07 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-07 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-07 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-07 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-06 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-06 17:48 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-06 13:24 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-06 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-06 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-06 00:10 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-05 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-10-05 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-10-05 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-05 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-05 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-05 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-04 21:37 UTCVendor advisory

Publicly available exploits

(10 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 6 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/gather/rails_doubletap_file_read✓ verified
    Published Apr 18, 2019

    Ruby On Rails File Content Disclosure ('doubletap')

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCkailing0220/CVE-2019-5418
    Published Oct 17, 2022

    Ruby on Rails是一个 Web 应用程序框架,是一个相对较新的 Web 应用程序框架,构建在 Ruby 语言之上。这个漏洞主要是由于Ruby on Rails使用了指定参数的render file来渲染应用之外的视图,我们可以通过修改访问某控制器的请求包,通过“…/…/…/…/”来达到路径穿越的目的,然后再通过“{{”来进行模板查询路径的闭合,使得所要访问的文件被当做外部模板来解析。

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2019/CVE-2019-5418.yaml
    Published Apr 8, 2020

    Rails File Content Disclosure

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCrandom-robbie/CVE-2019-5418
    Published Nov 19, 2019
    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCBad3r/RailroadBandit
    Published Apr 1, 2019

    a demo for Ruby on Rails CVE-2019-5418

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmpgn/Rails-doubletap-RCE
    Published Mar 23, 2019

    RCE on Rails 5.2.2 using a path traversal (CVE-2019-5418) and a deserialization of Ruby objects (CVE-2019-5420)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-46585
    Published Mar 21, 2019

    Rails 5.2.1 - Arbitrary File Content Disclosure

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkerbrompwnie/CVE-2019-5418-Scanner
    Published Mar 19, 2019

    A multi-threaded Golang scanner to identify Ruby endpoints vulnerable to CVE-2019-5418

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoComarkurt/CVE-2019-5418
    Published Mar 18, 2019

    File Content Disclosure on Rails Test Case - CVE-2019-5418

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCmpgn/CVE-2019-5418
    Published Mar 16, 2019

    CVE-2019-5418 - File Content Disclosure on Ruby on Rails

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2019-5418?
CVE-2019-5418 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 27, 2019. There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed.
When was CVE-2019-5418 made public?
CVE-2019-5418 was made public on March 13, 2019: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, HackerOne, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 27, 2019. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2019-5418 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2019-5418 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on July 7, 2025, affecting Rails Ruby on Rails. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-5418?
CVE-2019-5418 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-5418?
CVE-2019-5418 affects Rails Ruby on Rails. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2019-5418?
A fix for CVE-2019-5418 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2019-5418 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-5418

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-5418?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.