There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed.
CVE-2019-5418
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-07-07), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2019-0375 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 89EG Risk 89/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high. - EPSS PROB
- 99%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://web.archive.org/web/20190313201629/https://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2019/3/13/Rails-4-2-5-1-5-1-6-2-have-been-released/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5418
Published
March 27, 2019
Last Modified
October 30, 2025
Advisory Details (9)
Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026[SECURITY] Fedora 30 Update: rubygem-activemodel-5.2.3-2.fc30 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y43636TH4D6T46IC6N2RQVJTRFJAAYGA/[SECURITY] [DLA 1739-1] rails security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00042.htmlRedirecting to Google Groups
https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/rubyonrails-security/pFRKI96Sm8Qoss-security - [CVE-2019-5418] Amendment: Possible Remote Code Execution Exploit in Action View
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/22/1Vendor Advisories for CVE-2019-5418(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2019:1289Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: CloudForms 4.6.9 security, bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2019:1149Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: rh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack security update
- RHSA-2019:1147Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: rh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack security update
- RHSA-2019:0796Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: CloudForms 4.7.3 security, bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(9)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | ruby-railties (2:4.2.6-1ubuntu0.1~esm2) @ xenial | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | cfme-gemset-0:5.9.9.3-1.el7cf | 2019-05-29 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-ror50-rubygem-actionpack-1:5.0.1-2.el7 | 2019-05-13 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-ror42-rubygem-actionpack-1:4.2.6-5.el7 | 2019-05-13 | redhat |
| redhat | cfme-gemset-0:5.10.3.3-1.el7cf | 2019-04-23 | redhat |
| rubygems | actionview @ 5.0.7.2 (fixes >= 5.0.0, <= 5.0.7.1) | — | ghsa |
| rubygems | actionview @ 5.2.2.1 (fixes >= 5.2.0, <= 5.2.2.0) | — | ghsa |
| rubygems | actionview @ 4.2.11.1 (fixes >= 4.0.0, <= 4.2.11.0) | — | ghsa |
| rubygems | actionview @ 5.1.6.2 (fixes >= 5.1.0, <= 5.1.6.1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rails | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rails | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rails | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rails | — |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rails | 2:4.1.8-1, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u1, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u2, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u3, 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u4 |
| — |
RubyGems(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| actionview | 5.0.0 ... 5.0.7.1 (17 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 107× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 873 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 773 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-86g5-2wh3-gc9j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-23 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 10:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 09:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 20:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 10:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 12:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 17:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 13:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 00:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-05 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 21:37 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(10 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 6 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitauxiliary/gather/rails_doubletap_file_read✓ verifiedPublished Apr 18, 2019
Ruby On Rails File Content Disclosure ('doubletap')
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCkailing0220/CVE-2019-5418Published Oct 17, 2022
Ruby on Rails是一个 Web 应用程序框架,是一个相对较新的 Web 应用程序框架,构建在 Ruby 语言之上。这个漏洞主要是由于Ruby on Rails使用了指定参数的render file来渲染应用之外的视图,我们可以通过修改访问某控制器的请求包,通过“…/…/…/…/”来达到路径穿越的目的,然后再通过“{{”来进行模板查询路径的闭合,使得所要访问的文件被当做外部模板来解析。
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2019/CVE-2019-5418.yamlPublished Apr 8, 2020
Rails File Content Disclosure
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCrandom-robbie/CVE-2019-5418Published Nov 19, 2019
- GitHub PoCBad3r/RailroadBanditPublished Apr 1, 2019
a demo for Ruby on Rails CVE-2019-5418
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmpgn/Rails-doubletap-RCEPublished Mar 23, 2019
RCE on Rails 5.2.2 using a path traversal (CVE-2019-5418) and a deserialization of Ruby objects (CVE-2019-5420)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-46585Published Mar 21, 2019
Rails 5.2.1 - Arbitrary File Content Disclosure
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerbrompwnie/CVE-2019-5418-ScannerPublished Mar 19, 2019
A multi-threaded Golang scanner to identify Ruby endpoints vulnerable to CVE-2019-5418
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoComarkurt/CVE-2019-5418Published Mar 18, 2019
File Content Disclosure on Rails Test Case - CVE-2019-5418
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmpgn/CVE-2019-5418Published Mar 16, 2019
CVE-2019-5418 - File Content Disclosure on Ruby on Rails
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownRubyGems:actionview
- CVE-2016-0752NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-5419EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-6316EG 6.1MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-2097EG 5.3EPSS p91MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-5267NVD 4.0EG 4.8MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-8163NVD 8.8EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-8167EG 6.5MEDIUM
- CVE-2023-23913EG 6.3MEDIUM
- CVE-2022-27777EG 6.1MEDIUM
- CVE-2020-15169EG 5.4MEDIUM
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-22
- CVE-2019-5927EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-3828EG 4.2MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-3396EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-6240EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2019-3482EG 6.5EPSS p91MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-9922EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2019-9960EG 9.8EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9948EG 9.1EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-9649EG 5.3EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2019-9648EG 5.3EPSS p97MEDIUM
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2019-5418?
When was CVE-2019-5418 made public?
Is CVE-2019-5418 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2019-5418?
Which products are affected by CVE-2019-5418?
How do I remediate CVE-2019-5418?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2019-5418
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2019-5418?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.