CVE-2015-2590

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-03), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2015-2682 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 25%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45, and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4732.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
EPSS PROB
25%
EPSS %ILE
97th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
25% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2590

Published

July 16, 2015

Last Modified

April 21, 2026

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:7(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-66b27-1.12.5-1 ... 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb6u1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb7u1: fixed in 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb7u1
—
openjdk-77u13-2.3.6-1 ... 7u9-2.3.5~pre1-1 (66 versions)
  • every version up to 7u79-2.5.6-1~deb7u1: fixed in 7u79-2.5.6-1~deb7u1
—
Debian:6.0(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-66b18-1.8.10-0+squeeze1 ... 6b35-1.13.7-1~deb7u1 (102 versions)
  • every version up to 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb6u1: fixed in 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb6u1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-77u75-2.5.4-2 ... 7u79-2.5.6-1~deb7u1 (6 versions)
  • every version up to 7u79-2.5.6-1~deb8u1: fixed in 7u79-2.5.6-1~deb8u1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 200× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,808 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,708 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  8. 2026-10-31 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-31 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-31 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-30 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-29 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-29 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-27 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-27 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-26 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-25 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-25 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  7. 2026-10-24 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-24 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-23 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-23 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 18:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-22 18:09 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-22 18:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-21 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-21 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  23. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  24. 2026-10-20 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-20 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-20 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  28. 2026-10-19 15:04 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-19 15:04 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-19 15:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-18 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-18 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-18 11:03 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  35. 2026-10-17 13:03 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-17 13:03 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-17 13:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-16 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  39. 2026-10-16 12:03 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-16 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-16 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  43. 2026-10-15 11:02 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-15 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-15 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  47. 2026-10-14 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-14 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-14 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  51. 2026-10-13 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-13 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-12 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-12 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-12 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-12 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-12 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-11 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-10-11 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-11 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-11 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 25% · 97th percentile
  68. 2026-10-11 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-11 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-11 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-11 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-11 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-11 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhp7-xhx6-9x45 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-10 20:59 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-10-10 20:59 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2015-2590?
CVE-2015-2590 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 16, 2015. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45, and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4732.
When was CVE-2015-2590 made public?
CVE-2015-2590 was made public on July 14, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Oracle, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 16, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-2590 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2015-2590 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 3, 2022, affecting Oracle Java SE. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-2590?
CVE-2015-2590 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2015-2590?
CVE-2015-2590 affects Oracle Java SE. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2015-2590?
A fix for CVE-2015-2590 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2015-2590 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-2590

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-2590?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.