CVE-2015-4805

HIGHCVSS v2 · 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 5.6% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2015-4822 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 5.6%CVSS v2: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60, and Java SE Embedded 8u51, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Serialization.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
10.0HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
62
EG Risk 62/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation5.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
5.6%
EPSS %ILE
92nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
EG Likelihood
5.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 21, 2015

Last Modified

October 14, 2026

References (35)

15 of 35 shown · show the other 20

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:7(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-66b27-1.12.5-1 ... 6b38-1.13.10-1~deb6u1 (37 versions)
  • every version up to 6b38-1.13.10-1~deb7u1: fixed in 6b38-1.13.10-1~deb7u1
—
openjdk-77u13-2.3.6-1 ... 7u9-2.3.5~pre1-1 (75 versions)
  • every version up to 7u85-2.6.1-6~deb7u1: fixed in 7u85-2.6.1-6~deb7u1
—
Debian:6.0(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-66b18-1.8.10-0+squeeze1 ... 6b36-1.13.8-1~deb7u1 (105 versions)
  • every version up to 6b37-1.13.9-1~deb6u1: fixed in 6b37-1.13.9-1~deb6u1
—
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-77u75-2.5.4-2 ... 7u85-2.6.1-6~deb7u1 (15 versions)
  • every version up to 7u85-2.6.1-6~deb8u1: fixed in 7u85-2.6.1-6~deb8u1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 86× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 227 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 128 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-01 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-31 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-30 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-30 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-29 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  16. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-28 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-28 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-28 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-27 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-27 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  24. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-26 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  2. 2026-10-25 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-25 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-25 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-24 10:35 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-24 10:35 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-24 10:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-23 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-23 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  15. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.6% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-22 08:34 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-22 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-21 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-21 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-21 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  23. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-20 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-20 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-20 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  27. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  31. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-18 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-18 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-18 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  35. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  36. 2026-10-17 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-17 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  38. 2026-10-16 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  39. 2026-10-16 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-16 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  41. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  42. 2026-10-14 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-14 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  44. 2026-10-14 22:25 UTCNVD update
  45. 2026-10-14 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-14 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-14 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cq64-ppmj-mrvv · GitHub severity HIGH
  48. 2026-10-14 21:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  49. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  50. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  51. 2026-10-12 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  53. 2026-10-12 01:15 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  55. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  56. 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  57. 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  58. 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  59. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  60. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  61. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  62. 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  63. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  64. 2026-09-30 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  66. 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  67. 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  68. 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  69. 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  70. 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  71. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  72. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  73. 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile
  74. 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 6.3% · 93rd percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2015-4805?
CVE-2015-4805 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 21, 2015. Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u101, 7u85, and 8u60, and Java SE Embedded 8u51, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Serialization.
When was CVE-2015-4805 made public?
CVE-2015-4805 was made public on October 21, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Oracle, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 21, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-4805 actively exploited?
CVE-2015-4805 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (92nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2015-4805?
A fix for CVE-2015-4805 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-4805

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-4805?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.