Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 21 and earlier, 6 Update 45 and earlier, and 5.0 Update 45 and earlier, and OpenJDK 7, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D. NOTE: the previous information is from the June 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue allows remote attackers to bypass the Java sandbox via vectors related to "Incorrect image channel verification" in 2D.
CVE-2013-2465
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-28), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2013-2411 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 99% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2465
Published
June 18, 2013
Last Modified
April 22, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 29, 2026Mageia Advisory: MGASA-2013-0185 - Updated java-1.7.0-openjdk packages fix multiple security vulnerabilities
http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2013-0185.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2013-2465(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(11)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | openjdk-6-jre-lib (6b27-1.12.6-1ubuntu0.12.04.2) @ precise | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | openjdk-7-doc (7u25-2.3.10-1ubuntu0.13.04.2) @ raring | 2026-11-02 | ubuntu |
| redhat | java-1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.75-1jpp.1.el6_5 | 2014-04-17 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.14.0-1jpp.1.el5_9 | 2013-10-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.5.0-ibm-1:1.5.0.16.3-1jpp.1.el6_4 | 2013-07-16 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.14.0-1jpp.1.el6_4 | 2013-07-15 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.7.0-ibm-1:1.7.0.5.0-1jpp.2.el6_4 | 2013-07-15 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-1.62.1.11.11.90.el6_4 | 2013-07-03 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.7.0-oracle-1:1.7.0.25-1jpp.1.el6_4 | 2013-06-20 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.25-2.3.10.4.el5_9 | 2013-06-20 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4 | 2013-06-19 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:7(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openjdk-6 | 6b27-1.12.5-1, 6b27-1.12.5-2, 6b27-1.12.6-1~deb6u1 |
| — |
| openjdk-7 | 7u13-2.3.6-1 ... 7u9-2.3.5~pre1-1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openjdk-6 | 6b18-1.8.10-0+squeeze1 ... 6b27-1.12.5-2 (73 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(10)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2013:0957CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:0957 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:0958CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:0958 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:0963CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:0963 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:1014CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:1014 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:1059CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:1059 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:1060CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:1060 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:1081CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:1081 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2013:1456CRITICAL2013-06-18
RHSA-2013:1456 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-1907-1MEDIUM
OpenJDK 7 vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-1908-1MEDIUM
OpenJDK 6 vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 180× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,852 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,752 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 10:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 10:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 10:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 04:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 11:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 11:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 02:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 11:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 16:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 12:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 04:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 04:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-498p-qg8p-wgxg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-27705✓ verifiedPublished Aug 19, 2013
Java - 'storeImageArray()' Invalid Array Indexing (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/browser/java_storeimagearray✓ verifiedPublished Aug 16, 2013
Java storeImageArray() Invalid Array Indexing Vulnerability
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:7:openjdk-6
- CVE-2016-0494EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-0483EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2015-4883EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2015-4881EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2015-4860EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2015-4844EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2015-4843EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2015-4835EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2015-4805EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2015-4760EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2013:0957
- CVE-2013-2473EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2013-2472EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2013-2471EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2013-2470EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2013-2469EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2013-2463EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2013-2459EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2013-2448EG 7.6EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2013-2457EG 5.0EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2013-2456EG 5.0EPSS p92MEDIUM
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-693
- CVE-2013-0431NVD 5.3EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2012-5487CVSS v2 8.5EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2012-5493CVSS v2 8.5EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0772EG 6.5EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2017-2685EG 7.4HIGH
- CVE-2017-10952EG 8.8EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2017-3893NVD 1.9EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2017-8864EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-0094EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2018-6794EG 5.3EPSS p98MEDIUM
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2013-2465?
When was CVE-2013-2465 made public?
Is CVE-2013-2465 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2013-2465?
Which products are affected by CVE-2013-2465?
How do I remediate CVE-2013-2465?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2013-2465
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-2465?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.