CVE-2010-0738

CRITICALNVD 5.39.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). NVD baseline CVSS 5.3 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2010-0764 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at every mission impact level
CISA-KEV: ExploitedENISA EU KEV: Listed (Source: ENISA EUVD)EPSS PROB: 74%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified) · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
64
EG Risk 64/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
74%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
74% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

ENISA EU KEV: listed July 14, 2025, reported by CERT Italia.

Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0738

Published

April 28, 2010

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

574105 – (CVE-2010-0738) CVE-2010-0738 JBoss EAP jmx authentication bypass with crafted HTTP request

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574105
Web page

VUPEN Security - Vulnerability Research and Intelligence

http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0992
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39710
Web page

JBoss, JMX Console, misconfigured DeploymentScanner - CXSecurity.com

http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8408
Web page

Secunia Research & Vulnerability Insights | Flexera

http://secunia.com/advisories/39563
Web page

'[security bulletin] HPSBMU02714 SSRT100244 rev.2 - HP Network Node Manager i (NNMi) for HP-UX, Linux' - MARC

http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132129312609324&w=2

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrh-eap-docs-0:4.2.0-7.GA_CP09.ep1.4.1.el52010-04-27redhat
redhatrh-eap-docs-0:4.2.0-7.GA_CP09.ep1.5.el42010-04-27redhat
redhatrh-eap-docs-0:4.3.0-7.GA_CP08.ep1.6.el42010-04-27redhat
redhatrh-eap-docs-0:4.3.0-7.GA_CP08.ep1.5.el52010-04-27redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(4)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 186× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,757 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,657 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  4. 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  7. 2026-10-31 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 10:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  9. 2026-10-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 11:05 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 11:05 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-30 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  13. 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  16. 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  20. 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  24. 2026-10-26 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-26 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  2. 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  6. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2010-0764 · listed July 14, 2025 · reported by CERT Italia · Source: ENISA EUVD
  7. 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  10. 2026-10-24 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  14. 2026-10-23 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-23 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  17. 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  21. 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  25. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  29. 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  32. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  35. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  39. 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  43. 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-15 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  46. 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
  47. 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  50. 2026-10-13 06:07 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-13 06:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  52. 2026-10-12 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-12 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-12 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  55. 2026-10-12 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-12 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  57. 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  60. 2026-10-11 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-11 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-11 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  63. 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  66. 2026-10-11 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-11 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  68. 2026-10-11 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-11 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  70. 2026-10-11 00:26 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-11 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  72. 2026-10-10 20:07 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-10 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  74. 2026-10-10 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-10 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3

Publicly available exploits

(12 references, 10 shown)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (7 Metasploit modules, 4 Exploit-DB entries), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/jboss_deploymentfilerepository✓ verified
    Published Dec 12, 2014

    JBoss JMX Console DeploymentFileRepository WAR Upload and Deployment

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/jboss_bshdeployer✓ verified
    Published Aug 22, 2014

    JBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_icm_urlscan✓ verified
    Published Oct 22, 2011

    SAP URL Scanner

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-16274✓ verified
    Published Mar 4, 2011

    JBoss Application Server 4.2 < 4.2.0.CP09 / 4.3 < 4.3.0.CP08 - Remote Command Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-16319✓ verified
    Published Jan 10, 2011

    JBoss JMX - Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-16316✓ verified
    Published Aug 3, 2010

    JBoss - Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/jboss_vulnscan✓ verified
    Published Jun 21, 2010

    JBoss Vulnerability Scanner

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_bshdeployer✓ verified
    Published Jun 21, 2010

    JBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_deploymentfilerepository✓ verified
    Published May 7, 2010

    JBoss Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_maindeployer✓ verified
    Published Feb 21, 2010

    JBoss JMX Console Deployer Upload and Execute

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2010-0738?
CVE-2010-0738 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 28, 2010. The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET…
When was CVE-2010-0738 made public?
CVE-2010-0738 was made public on April 26, 2010: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on April 28, 2010. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2010-0738 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2010-0738 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on May 25, 2022, affecting Red Hat JBoss. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it. ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue lists CVE-2010-0738 (added July 14, 2025, reported by CERT Italia): ENISA records its exploitation in the wild. Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-0738?
CVE-2010-0738 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.3 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + ENISA's EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2010-0738?
CVE-2010-0738 affects Red Hat JBoss.
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0738?
A fix for CVE-2010-0738 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0738

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0738?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.