The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method.
CVE-2010-0738
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-25), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). NVD baseline CVSS 5.3 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2010-0764 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at every mission impact level
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 64EG Risk 64/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 74%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 5.3 MEDIUM.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 74% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
ENISA EU KEV: listed July 14, 2025, reported by CERT Italia.
Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0738
Published
April 28, 2010
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026574105 – (CVE-2010-0738) CVE-2010-0738 JBoss EAP jmx authentication bypass with crafted HTTP request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574105VUPEN Security - Vulnerability Research and Intelligence
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0992JBoss, JMX Console, misconfigured DeploymentScanner - CXSecurity.com
http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8408'[security bulletin] HPSBMU02714 SSRT100244 rev.2 - HP Network Node Manager i (NNMi) for HP-UX, Linux' - MARC
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132129312609324&w=2Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.2.0-7.GA_CP09.ep1.4.1.el5 | 2010-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.2.0-7.GA_CP09.ep1.5.el4 | 2010-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.3.0-7.GA_CP08.ep1.6.el4 | 2010-04-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-eap-docs-0:4.3.0-7.GA_CP08.ep1.5.el5 | 2010-04-27 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(4)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 186× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,757 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,657 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-31 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 10:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 11:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 11:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-26 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2010-0764 · listed July 14, 2025 · reported by CERT Italia · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-24 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-23 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 75% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-13 06:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 06:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-12 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-12 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-11 00:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-10 20:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-10 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-72pp-v9jm-c6xj · GitHub CVSS 5.3
Publicly available exploits
(12 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (7 Metasploit modules, 4 Exploit-DB entries), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/jboss_deploymentfilerepository✓ verifiedPublished Dec 12, 2014
JBoss JMX Console DeploymentFileRepository WAR Upload and Deployment
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/jboss_bshdeployer✓ verifiedPublished Aug 22, 2014
JBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_icm_urlscan✓ verifiedPublished Oct 22, 2011
SAP URL Scanner
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-16274✓ verifiedPublished Mar 4, 2011
JBoss Application Server 4.2 < 4.2.0.CP09 / 4.3 < 4.3.0.CP08 - Remote Command Execution
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-16319✓ verifiedPublished Jan 10, 2011
JBoss JMX - Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-16316✓ verifiedPublished Aug 3, 2010
JBoss - Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/jboss_vulnscan✓ verifiedPublished Jun 21, 2010
JBoss Vulnerability Scanner
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_bshdeployer✓ verifiedPublished Jun 21, 2010
JBoss JMX Console Beanshell Deployer WAR Upload and Deployment
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_deploymentfilerepository✓ verifiedPublished May 7, 2010
JBoss Java Class DeploymentFileRepository WAR Deployment
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/jboss_maindeployer✓ verifiedPublished Feb 21, 2010
JBoss JMX Console Deployer Upload and Execute
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
2 shownredhat:RHSA-2010:0376
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-749
- CVE-2010-1428NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-0758EG 9.3HIGH
- CVE-2006-1547NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-5415EG 9.1EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-7462EG 8.5HIGH
- CVE-2016-9469EG 8.2HIGH
- CVE-2017-2735EG 7.1HIGH
- CVE-2018-8949EG 4.3MEDIUM
- CVE-2018-8868NVD 6.2EG 6.4MEDIUM
- CVE-2018-10931EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2010-0738?
When was CVE-2010-0738 made public?
Is CVE-2010-0738 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2010-0738?
Which products are affected by CVE-2010-0738?
How do I remediate CVE-2010-0738?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-0738
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-0738?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.