CVE-2006-1547

CRITICALNVD 7.59.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-21), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2022-3054 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7qwv-cwgj-c8rj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 55%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

ActionForm in Apache Software Foundation (ASF) Struts before 1.2.9 with BeanUtils 1.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a multipart/form-data encoded form with a parameter name that references the public getMultipartRequestHandler method, which provides further access to elements in the CommonsMultipartRequestHandler implementation and BeanUtils.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
89
EG Risk 89/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
55%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
55% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply updates per vendor instructions.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1547

Published

March 30, 2006

Last Modified

April 16, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available.
Web page

VUPEN Security - Vulnerability Research and Intelligence

http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1205
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17342
Web page

Secunia Research & Vulnerability Insights | Flexera

http://secunia.com/advisories/20117
Web page

Secunia Research & Vulnerability Insights | Flexera

http://secunia.com/advisories/19493

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatpatch2006-05-03redhat
mavenstruts:struts @ 1.2.9 (fixes < 1.2.9)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
struts:struts1.0.2 ... 1.2.8 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 1.2.9: fixed in 1.2.9
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 131× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 1,023 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 923 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7qwv-cwgj-c8rj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-11-01 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7qwv-cwgj-c8rj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-11-01 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-11-01 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-31 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-30 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-29 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 10:14 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-29 10:14 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 11:30 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-28 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 12:47 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-27 12:47 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-26 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-26 14:04 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 15:18 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-24 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:35 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-23 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-23 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-22 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-21 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-20 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-20 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-19 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-18 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-18 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-18 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-17 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-17 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-17 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-16 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-10-16 04:02 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-16 04:02 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-15 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-15 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-15 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-14 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-10-14 06:33 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-14 06:33 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-13 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-10-13 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-12 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-12 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-12 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-12 00:30 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-12 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-11 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-11 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-11 11:32 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-11 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-11 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-11 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-10 22:34 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-10 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-10 19:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 99th percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 18:17 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-10 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-10 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-10 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-10 01:02 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-09 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-09 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-09 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 55% · 98th percentile
  66. 2026-10-09 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-09 12:08 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-09 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-09 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-08 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-08 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-08 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-08 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-08 01:40 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2006-1547?
CVE-2006-1547 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 30, 2006. ActionForm in Apache Software Foundation (ASF) Struts before 1.2.9 with BeanUtils 1.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a multipart/form-data encoded form with a parameter name that references the public getMultipartRequestHandler method, which provides further access to…
When was CVE-2006-1547 made public?
CVE-2006-1547 was made public on March 30, 2006: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 30, 2006. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2006-1547 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2006-1547 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on January 21, 2022, affecting Apache Struts 1. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2006-1547?
CVE-2006-1547 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2006-1547?
CVE-2006-1547 affects Apache Struts 1. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2006-1547?
A fix for CVE-2006-1547 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2006-1547

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2006-1547?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.