Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in `/api/v1/responses` Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's Flow
🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)
📋 Description
Summary
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name helper function in src/backend/base/langflow/helpers/flow.py (lines 399-414).
When a flow is accessed via UUID (flow_id), the function queries the database directly without verifying if the authenticated user owns that flow:
# src/backend/base/langflow/helpers/flow.py:399-414
async def get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name(flow_id_or_name: str, user_id: str | UUID | None = None) -> FlowRead:
async with session_scope() as session:
try:
flow_id = UUID(flow_id_or_name)
# When using UUID, query directly WITHOUT checking user_id
flow = await session.get(Flow, flow_id) # ❌ No user_id check!
except ValueError:
endpoint_name = flow_id_or_name
stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.endpoint_name == endpoint_name)
# Only when using endpoint_name is user_id checked
if user_id:
stmt = stmt.where(Flow.user_id == uuid_user_id)
This function is used by the /api/v1/responses endpoint (defined in src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/openai_responses.py:589).
PoC (Proof of Concept)
# Attacker (user A) with API_KEY_A tries to execute victim (user B)'s flow
curl -X POST "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/responses" \
-H "x-api-key: sk-ATTACKER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "VICTIM_FLOW_ID",
"input_value": "test",
"stream": false
}'
# Returns 200 and executes the victim's flow
Impact
Any authenticated user can:
- Execute any flow in the system by knowing its flow ID
- Access potentially sensitive data processed by victim's flows
- Consume victim's resources
Fixes
Fixed in PR #12832 (fix(security): close IDOR in get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name), merged 2026-04-22, released in Langflow 1.9.1.
The helper normalizes user_id once and enforces ownership on both lookup branches (UUID and endpoint_name):
flow_id = UUID(flow_id_or_name)
flow = await session.get(Flow, flow_id)
if flow is not None and uuid_user_id is not None and flow.user_id != uuid_user_id:
flow = None # cross-user lookup falls through to the shared 404
Key points:
- Cross-user lookups return 404 (not 403), so flow existence is not disclosed via a 403-vs-404 oracle.
/api/v1/responsesand/api/v2/workflowpassuser_idexplicitly, so fixing the helper closes them directly; the/api/v1/run*routes were additionally moved from a bareDepends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)to auth-aware wrapper dependencies (defense in depth).- A malformed
user_idnow fails closed (404 instead of a raw 500). - Webhook routes intentionally keep the unscoped lookup (public by design / explicit ownership check elsewhere).
- Regression tests cover the cross-user UUID case and reproduce the original PoC against
/api/v1/responses.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the security researchers who responsibly disclosed this vulnerability:
- @yzeirnials
- @johnatzeropath
- @LeftenantZero
- @Zwique
🎯 Affected products1
- pip/langflow:< 1.9.1
🔗 References (8)
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12832
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55255
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/2c9f498d664a3c32698b57d7c5e752625291060e
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/langflow/PYSEC-2026-221.yaml
- https://webflow.sysdig.com/blog/understanding-langflow-cve-2026-55255-and-why-higher-cvss-vulnerabilities-arent-always-the-most-exploited
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-55255
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qrpv-q767-xqq2