CVE-2026-98050

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-86703 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Fix napi_gro_receive() call from GC workqueue context

Currently mlxsw_sp1_ptp_ht_gc_collect() is run from the PTP garbage-collection workqueue, rather than the NAPI poll context. For any unmatched PTP entries carrying an SKB, it calls mlxsw_sp1_ptp_unmatched_finish() -> mlxsw_sp1_ptp_packet_finish(). For ingress packets, this calls mlxsw_sp_rx_listener_no_mark_func(). The end of that function is the following:

skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev); napi_gro_receive(mlxsw_skb_cb(skb)->rx_md_info.napi, skb);

The napi pointer is one that was placed in the SKB control block when the trapped packet was received in the NAPI context. Later, when the GC reaps the unmatched entry (up to MLXSW_SP1_PTP_HT_GC_TIMEOUT later), the call to napi_gro_receive() mutates the NAPI instance's GRO list, which is unsafe if the poll is running concurrently on another CPU.

In mlxsw_sp1_ptp_ht_gc_collect(), local_bh_disable() is called to prevent softirq processing, but this only applies to the local CPU. Additionally, its comment is stale. It states that mlxsw_sp1_ptp_unmatched_finish() invokes netif_receive_skb(). This has not been accurate since the referenced commit; this patch makes that comment accurate again. mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_init() calls netif_threaded_enable() on the NAPI RX net_device without any conditions. The NAPI instance's poll, which may be running concurrent to the GC, is running as an independently-scheduled kthread which may be on a different CPU. The call to local_bh_disable() does not guard against this.

If a tx-timestamp timeout produces an unmatched entry (which can be easily reproduced by running ptp4l and waiting for a port to reach the UNCALIBRATED/SLAVE state) while the owning NAPI thread is in the middle of a poll on another CPU, both sides mutate the GRO list concurrently, as shown below:

[39.846] port 1 (swp1): MASTER to UNCALIBRATED on RS_SLAVE list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff8d620faf4138), but was ffff8d624150f700. (next=ffff8d620faf4138). kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:29! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 539 Comm: napi/mlxsw_rx-0 Not tainted 6.18.48 #1-NixOS PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2410/VMOD0001, BIOS 4.6.5 09/13/2018 RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x79/0xb0 RSP: 0018:ffffcdf8c0f27c08 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000075 RBX: ffff8d624150fd00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8d6315d1e540 RBP: ffff8d620faf4070 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffdfff R10: ffffffffa5c60fe0 R11: ffffcdf8c0f27ab8 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 000000000000003d R14: 00000000000001bc R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d636f63f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000562689a60c24 CR3: 000000015f224004 CR4: 00000000001726f0 Call Trace: gro_receive_skb+0xee/0x230 mlxsw_sp1_ptp_got_packet+0x61/0x140 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_core_skb_receive+0xdf/0x1b0 [mlxsw_core] mlxsw_pci_napi_poll_cq_rx+0x780/0x9d0 [mlxsw_pci] __napi_poll+0x31/0x1e0 napi_threaded_poll_loop+0x16b/0x1c0 napi_threaded_poll+0x71/0xa0 kthread+0xfb/0x260 ret_from_fork+0x22d/0x260 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

The machinery that leads to this kernel panic has not been changed between 6.18.48 and mainline.

This patch adds an ingress-delivery helper for the PTP packet_finish() path that calls netif_receive_skb() instead of napi_gro_receive(). netif_receive_skb(), unlike napi_gro_receive(), can be called from outside of the NAPI instance's poll context, which can occur at the call site for this path. RX stats accounting and the skb->dev assignment are still preserved; the only change is the delivery call itself.

This removes GR ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Fix napi_gro_receive() call from GC workqueue context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ac174dfcdde399fa95ba889541fb5e688d8bb35
Web page

mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Fix napi_gro_receive() call from GC workqueue context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ddcc460176eb34f9bc5bda3cc274d0d24dc62a9
Web page

mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Fix napi_gro_receive() call from GC workqueue context - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4375b3d1c2898886df1f908160c7004bdd938e73

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98050(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 71× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 109 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 10 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:22 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-11-01 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-25 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-25 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  22. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-19 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-13 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  8. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-10-11 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-11 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-10-10 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-10 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-09 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-09 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  25. 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  26. 2026-10-08 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  27. 2026-10-08 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-08 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-10-07 14:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  31. 2026-10-07 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-07 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-10-06 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  35. 2026-10-06 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-10-05 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-05 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  38. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  39. 2026-10-05 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-05 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  42. 2026-10-04 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  43. 2026-10-04 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  44. 2026-10-03 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-03 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  46. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  47. 2026-10-03 04:56 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-03 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  50. 2026-10-02 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  51. 2026-10-02 04:02 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-02 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  53. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  54. 2026-10-01 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-10-01 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-10-01 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  58. 2026-09-30 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-09-30 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-09-29 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-29 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-09-29 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-29 06:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-09-28 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-28 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  66. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  67. 2026-09-28 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-09-27 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-27 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  71. 2026-09-27 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-09-26 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-26 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g63f-gg2v-x4xj · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-98050?
CVE-2026-98050 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Fix napi_gro_receive() call from GC workqueue context Currently mlxsw_sp1_ptp_ht_gc_collect() is run from the PTP garbage-collection workqueue, rather than the NAPI poll context. For any unmatched PTP entries…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-98050 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-98050 was published on September 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-98050 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98050 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-98050?
CVE-2026-98050 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98050?
A fix for CVE-2026-98050 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98050 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98050

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98050?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.