CVE-2026-94287

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-88179 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path in libXpm before 3.5.19 could be used by local attackers to cause unbounded CPU usage and memory exhaustion.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 28, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 28, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ParsePixels: reject zero-dimension XPM images (!32) · Merge requests · xorg / lib / libXpm · GitLab

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxpm/-/merge_requests/32/diffs?commit_id=3a68f818b1628d7ad96245b0f4d15a32a015b0ab

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-94287(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuxpmutils (1:3.5.17-1ubuntu0.26.04.2) @ resolute2026-10-22ubuntu
redhatlibxpm-main-3.5.19-4.hum12026-07-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libxpm1:3.5.12-1.1, 1:3.5.12-1.1+deb12u1, 1:3.5.17-1, 1:3.5.19-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libxpm1:3.5.17-1, 1:3.5.17-1+deb13u1, 1:3.5.19-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
libxpm1:3.5.17-1, 1:3.5.19-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 84 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-28 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-28 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-28 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  7. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-22 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-22 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  16. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 14:42 UTCEG score recompute
Show 58 more
  1. 2026-10-11 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  4. 2026-10-11 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-10 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-10 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  11. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 17:39 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-09 17:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-10-08 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-08 17:31 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-08 17:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  17. 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-07 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-10-06 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-06 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-06 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  24. 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-05 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-05 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  28. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  29. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  30. 2026-10-04 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-04 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  32. 2026-10-03 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-03 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  34. 2026-10-02 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-02 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  36. 2026-10-01 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-01 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-01 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  40. 2026-09-30 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-30 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-30 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-09-29 22:11 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-29 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-29 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-09-29 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-29 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-29 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  50. 2026-09-28 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-28 14:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  52. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  53. 2026-09-28 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-28 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  55. 2026-09-28 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-28 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ggh5-2m6x-59xg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  57. 2026-09-28 09:12 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  58. 2026-09-28 09:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-94287?
CVE-2026-94287 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 28, 2026. A denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path in libXpm before 3.5.19 could be used by local attackers to cause unbounded CPU usage and memory exhaustion.
When was CVE-2026-94287 made public?
CVE-2026-94287 was made public on September 28, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, SUSE, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 28, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-94287 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-94287 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-94287?
CVE-2026-94287 has a CVSS base score of 5.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-94287?
A fix for CVE-2026-94287 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-94287 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-94287

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-94287?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.