A flaw was found in Keycloak. The cross-session verification proof is keyed only by (local userId, idpAlias) and is not bound to the upstream identity that was actually verified, so a second upstream account on the same IdP can consume it and get linked to the victim's local account.
CVE-2026-9087
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (24th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 6.4 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-05-20) is not newer than that change (2026-08-03), so it does not.
Also known asEUVD-2026-31134 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-m6qj-3mpp-57v8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 37EG Risk 37/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity81% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 24th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 20, 2026
Last Modified
August 3, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jun 10, 20262480172 – (CVE-2026-9087) CVE-2026-9087 keycloak: Cross-Session Email Verification Proof Not Bound to Upstream Identity in First-Broker-Login
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480172Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-9087(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:30050Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 Images Security Update
- RHSA-2026:30049Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 Security Update
- RHSA-2026:25098Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 Update
- RHSA-2026:25097Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 Images Update
- GHSA-m6qj-3mpp-57v8GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
Keycloak: Insufficient verification proof scoping enables identity provider account linking attack and account compromise
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | 2026-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator:26.4-19 | 2026-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator:26.6-6 | 2026-06-10 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 1.0-alpha-1 ... 9.0.3 (227 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 246 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 148 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-28 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-13 04:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-23 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 16:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
- 2026-08-21 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-20 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:25097
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-9087?
When was CVE-2026-9087 made public?
Is CVE-2026-9087 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9087?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9087?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-9087
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9087?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.