CVE-2026-89139

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-83897 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Temporal Technologies Inc.) states them: "Upgrade to Temporal Server 1.32.0 or 1.31.3."

Temporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that provider executes are taken from the compute provider configuration supplied in the caller's request rather than from operator configuration. An authenticated caller holding only a write role in a single namespace can therefore configure a worker deployment version so that the Worker Service executes a command of the caller's choosing on its own host, under the account the server process runs as. Execution is immediate rather than deferred: the configuration handler invokes every provider using the invoke strategy directly after validating the submitted specification, so no scaling decision, task arrival, or unusual request sequence is required. Because the Worker Service process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster and the cluster's TLS material, the consequence reaches beyond the caller's namespace to the cluster as a whole. The provider is present in the official temporal-server binaries and container images for the affected releases. The only control that can keep it unreachable is the compute provider allowlist, the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled, and that control does not deny by default: its default value is an unset list, and the allowlist check is skipped entirely when the value is unset, so every registered compute provider is permitted, this one included. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check the following together. The deployed Temporal Server version is 1.31.0 or later and earlier than 1.31.3. The Worker Service is running, which it is in the default service set and therefore in a stock deployment. The effective per-namespace value of workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled is either unset or contains subprocess. And authorization is configured, meaning a real authorizer and claim mapper are in place; a deployment running with no authorizer already grants every caller unrestricted access to every namespace, so it has no namespace boundary for this to cross. Note that the separate per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.enabled does not gate the affected path. It defaults to false, and a deployment that has never set it in any namespace is still affected, which was confirmed by running an affected release with no value for that setting present anywhere in dynamic configuration. To look for a compute configuration that is already attached, call DescribeWorkerDeploymentVersion for each worker deployment version in each namespace and check whether any scaling group's compute provider type is subprocess.

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity87% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
47th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 21, 2026

Last Modified

September 22, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 21, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github_pr.
GitHub pull request

Upgrade go.temporal.io/auto-scaled-workers

Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #12021 on 2026-09-11 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12021
GitHub pull request

Change default compute provider config behavior

Fix merged in temporalio/temporal-auto-scaled-workers PR #129 on 2026-09-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/temporalio/temporal-auto-scaled-workers/pull/129
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.31.3

Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.31.3

https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.31.3
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.32.0

Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.32.0

https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.32.0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89139(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 116 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 16 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-20 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 04:59 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-12 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  10. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  13. 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-10-09 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-09 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  20. 2026-10-09 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  21. 2026-10-08 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-08 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  23. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-08 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  26. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  27. 2026-10-07 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  28. 2026-10-07 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  29. 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  31. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  32. 2026-10-06 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-06 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  34. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  35. 2026-10-05 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  36. 2026-10-05 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-05 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  38. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  39. 2026-10-04 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  40. 2026-10-03 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-03 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  42. 2026-10-03 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  43. 2026-10-02 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-02 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  45. 2026-10-02 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  46. 2026-10-01 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-01 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  48. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  49. 2026-10-01 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  50. 2026-09-30 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-30 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  52. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  53. 2026-09-30 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  54. 2026-09-29 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-29 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  56. 2026-09-29 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-29 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  58. 2026-09-28 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-28 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  60. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  61. 2026-09-28 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  62. 2026-09-27 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-27 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  64. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  65. 2026-09-27 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-27 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  67. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  68. 2026-09-26 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  69. 2026-09-26 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-26 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  71. 2026-09-25 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  72. 2026-09-24 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-24 22:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
  74. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  75. 2026-09-24 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89139?
CVE-2026-89139 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 21, 2026. Temporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89139 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89139 was published on September 21, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89139 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89139 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89139?
CVE-2026-89139 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89139?
A fix for CVE-2026-89139 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Temporal Technologies Inc.) states them: "Upgrade to Temporal Server 1.32.0 or 1.31.3." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89139 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-89139

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89139?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.