Temporal Server compiles a Worker Controller Instance module into its Worker Service, and that module registers a compute provider named subprocess whose function is to launch a worker by running a command on the machine hosting the Worker Service. The program name and the argument vector that provider executes are taken from the compute provider configuration supplied in the caller's request rather than from operator configuration. An authenticated caller holding only a write role in a single namespace can therefore configure a worker deployment version so that the Worker Service executes a command of the caller's choosing on its own host, under the account the server process runs as. Execution is immediate rather than deferred: the configuration handler invokes every provider using the invoke strategy directly after validating the submitted specification, so no scaling decision, task arrival, or unusual request sequence is required. Because the Worker Service process holds the persistence credentials for every namespace in the cluster and the cluster's TLS material, the consequence reaches beyond the caller's namespace to the cluster as a whole. The provider is present in the official temporal-server binaries and container images for the affected releases. The only control that can keep it unreachable is the compute provider allowlist, the per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled, and that control does not deny by default: its default value is an unset list, and the allowlist check is skipped entirely when the value is unset, so every registered compute provider is permitted, this one included. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check the following together. The deployed Temporal Server version is 1.31.0 or later and earlier than 1.31.3. The Worker Service is running, which it is in the default service set and therefore in a stock deployment. The effective per-namespace value of workercontroller.compute_providers.enabled is either unset or contains subprocess. And authorization is configured, meaning a real authorizer and claim mapper are in place; a deployment running with no authorizer already grants every caller unrestricted access to every namespace, so it has no namespace boundary for this to cross. Note that the separate per-namespace dynamic configuration setting workercontroller.enabled does not gate the affected path. It defaults to false, and a deployment that has never set it in any namespace is still affected, which was confirmed by running an affected release with no value for that setting present anywhere in dynamic configuration. To look for a compute configuration that is already attached, call DescribeWorkerDeploymentVersion for each worker deployment version in each namespace and check whether any scaling group's compute provider type is subprocess.
CVE-2026-89139
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-83897 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Temporal Technologies Inc.) states them: "Upgrade to Temporal Server 1.32.0 or 1.31.3."
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity87% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 21, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 21, 2026Upgrade go.temporal.io/auto-scaled-workers
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #12021 on 2026-09-11 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12021Change default compute provider config behavior
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal-auto-scaled-workers PR #129 on 2026-09-10 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal-auto-scaled-workers/pull/129v1.31.3
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.31.3
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.31.3v1.32.0
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.32.0
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.32.0Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89139(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 116 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 16 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-27 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-20 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-13 04:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-09 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-08 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-07 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-07 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-06 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-05 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-05 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-04 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-03 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-03 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-02 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-02 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-01 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-01 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-30 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-30 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-29 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-29 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-28 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-28 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-27 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-27 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-26 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-26 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-25 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-24 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 22:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-24 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w8cx-4cf2-9hvr · GitHub severity HIGH
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-89139?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89139 published?
Is CVE-2026-89139 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89139?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89139?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-89139
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89139?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.