Snipe-IT's predefined kit checkout path does not enforce Full Multiple Company Support (FMCS) tenant isolation on the checkout target. Unlike the single, bulk, API, accessory, license and consumable checkout paths, App\Services\PredefinedKitCheckoutService never calls $item->canCheckoutTo($target); it only performs the actor-vs-item policy check and an availability check before persisting the checkout. With FMCS enabled, a non-superuser who belongs to at least two companies and holds the assets.checkout permission can POST to /kits/{kit}/checkout with a user_id belonging only to company B and have a company-A asset (and likewise kit licenses, consumables and accessories) assigned to that user, bypassing the company-mismatch check that blocks the same operation on every other checkout path. The issue is fixed in Snipe-IT 8.7.2; it was runtime-verified on v8.6.3 and code-inspected on v8.7.1, and the affected service has lacked the check since 2019, so earlier FMCS deployments are likely also affected.
CVE-2026-88894
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.4; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-75444 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.4
- EG Score
- 5.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity54% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.4 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 29, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 10, 2026Snipe-IT before 8.7.2 Authorization Bypass via Predefined Kit Checkout | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/snipe-it-before-8.7.2-authorization-bypass-via-predefined-kit-checkoutPredefined kit checkout bypasses FMCS company isolation · Advisory · grokability/snipe-it · GitHub
https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/security/advisories/GHSA-g7jx-p4xf-m777Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-88894(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 121 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 21 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-29 22:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-22 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-09 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-08 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-07 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-06 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 18:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-05 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-04 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-03 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-02 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-30 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-29 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-29 10:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-28 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-27 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-26 10:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-25 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-24 10:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-23 11:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-22 11:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-21 12:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 12:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-20 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-19 12:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-17 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3494-v6qm-q294 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-88894?
When was CVE-2026-88894 made public?
Is CVE-2026-88894 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-88894?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-88894?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-88894
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-88894?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.