CVE-2026-88804

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.69.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-88340 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 9.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (SUSE) lists SUSE Rancher versions 2.15.0 up to but not including 2.15.2, 2.14.0 up to but not including 2.14.6, 2.13.0 up to but not including 2.13.10, 2.12.0 up to but not including 2.12.14 and 1 more range as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

An unauthenticated update of public UI settings could be used by remote attackers to execute a stored cross-site scripting attack in the Rancher UI, in SUSE Rancher 2.15 before 2.15.2, 2.14 before 2.14.6, 2.13 before 2.13.10, 2.12 before 2.12.14 and 2.11 before 2.11.18.

CVSS v3
9.6
EG Score
9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
43
EG Risk 43/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity96% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
29th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.6 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 28, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated update of public UI settings leading to stored cross-site scripting in Rancher · Advisory · rancher/rancher · GitHub

https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-992f-xh8r-jg2f

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 65× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-02 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  5. 2026-10-31 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  13. 2026-10-27 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  19. 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-24 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-23 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-10-23 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Show 53 more
  1. 2026-10-22 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  7. 2026-10-19 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-17 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 07:03 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-15 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-11 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-10 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-09 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  31. 2026-10-08 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  33. 2026-10-07 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  35. 2026-10-06 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  37. 2026-10-05 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  39. 2026-10-05 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  41. 2026-10-03 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-02 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-01 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  45. 2026-09-30 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  47. 2026-09-29 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-28 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-28 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-28 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-28 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-28 16:04 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.6 CRITICAL
  53. 2026-09-28 16:01 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-88804?
CVE-2026-88804 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 28, 2026. An unauthenticated update of public UI settings could be used by remote attackers to execute a stored cross-site scripting attack in the Rancher UI, in SUSE Rancher 2.15 before 2.15.2, 2.14 before 2.14.6, 2.13 before 2.13.10, 2.12 before 2.12.14 and 2.11 before 2.11.18.
When was CVE-2026-88804 made public?
CVE-2026-88804 was made public on September 28, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, SUSE, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 28, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-88804 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-88804 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-88804?
CVE-2026-88804 has a CVSS base score of 9.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-88804?
No fix for CVE-2026-88804 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix. The CVE record's CNA (SUSE) lists SUSE Rancher versions 2.15.0 up to but not including 2.15.2, 2.14.0 up to but not including 2.14.6, 2.13.0 up to but not including 2.13.10, 2.12.0 up to but not including 2.12.14 and 1 more range as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-88804

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-88804?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.