Temporal Server decided whether a Workflow completion callback was internal by reading a caller-supplied HTTP header. An authenticated caller holding only write permission in a single namespace could attach a completion callback whose URL host matched the configured callback address allowlist, whose URL path was any Temporal HTTP API route, and whose header map contained a non-empty header named source. When the History service delivered that callback, the non-empty source header caused it to re-target the request at the local frontend client and rewrite only the scheme and host, preserving the caller's path, query, and request body. Where an internal frontend is deployed with its HTTP API enabled, that client resolves to the internal frontend, which authorizes every request as a system administrator without requiring authentication information. The result is that the server performs an attacker-chosen state-changing HTTP POST against its own administrative API on the caller's behalf, in namespaces where the caller has no permission. The caller never needs network access to the internal frontend, because the History service makes the request. Confirmed effects include terminating Workflows in other namespaces, registering namespaces, modifying another namespace's configuration, and deleting another namespace and its Workflows. The affected routing logic is present in both the HSM and CHASM callback delivery implementations. This description and the CVSS score in this record describe releases 1.30.0 and later, where any non-empty source header is sufficient. Releases 1.25.0 through 1.29.7 are affected by a narrower form of the same defect in which the header must exactly match a configured cluster ID, a UUID that a namespace-scoped caller cannot read through the API. The consequence once that match occurs is the same, but the attack is materially harder and scores lower. To determine whether a deployment is affected, check two settings together: the static Server configuration for a non-zero services.internal-frontend.rpc.httpPort, and the effective per-namespace dynamic configuration value of component.callbacks.allowedAddresses. A deployment is exposed only when an internal frontend is deployed with a non-zero HTTP port, at least one allowlist rule admits a host, and authorization is enabled. The allowlist is empty by default, which denies all external callback URLs, and the stock static topology does not include an internal frontend. Note that a failed attach returns the error 'invalid url: url does not match any configured callback address', which proves only that one tested URL did not match and does not prove the effective allowlist is empty. To look for callbacks already attached, use DescribeWorkflowExecution, which returns callback information for a Workflow's registered completion callbacks. Operators should be aware of a gap when searching for evidence of delivery: the frontend HTTP API server records the request method and URL at debug level only, so at default log levels a delivered request is not written to the internal frontend's logs, and the absence of such log entries is not evidence that the issue was not exploited.
CVE-2026-87858
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (55th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-83896 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.2
- EG Score
- 7.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity72% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.8% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 55th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 21, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Sep 21, 2026v1.32.0
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.32.0
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.32.0v1.31.3
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.31.3
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.31.3v1.30.7
Patch available: temporalio/temporal v1.30.7
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/releases/tag/v1.30.7[v1.30] Add Nexus callback source header inspection toggle
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #12085 on 2026-09-15 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/12085[v1.31] Add Nexus callback source header inspection toggle
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #11982 on 2026-09-09 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/11982Make Nexus callback source header opt-in
Fix merged in temporalio/temporal PR #11965 on 2026-09-08 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/pull/11965Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-87858(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 113 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 13 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-27 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-20 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-13 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-11 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 07:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-09 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-08 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-07 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-06 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-06 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-05 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-05 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-04 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-04 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-03 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-03 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-02 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-01 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-01 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-30 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-09-30 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-29 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-29 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-28 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-09-28 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-09-27 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
- 2026-09-26 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-25 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-25 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-24 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-23 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrgw-vghm-5p74 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-87858?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-87858 published?
Is CVE-2026-87858 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87858?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-87858?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-87858
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-87858?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.