CVE-2026-86064

HIGHPre-NVD 8.68.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-23. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.6; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-85574 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9v8p-frvj-2pcm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 8.6Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the default-open GET /log WebSocket route configured in config/node/api.yaml and registered by network/api/api.go does not require authentication. The first client message is parsed as a logger Profile in network/api/logs/logSender.go and applied process-wide through Profile.Apply, allowing a remote client to change global log levels and formatting options until the connection closes. The same connection is registered as a log observer and can receive live process logs. An attacker can suppress normal logs, increase verbosity, distort operator visibility, and access operational information without credentials. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.

CVSS v3
8.6
EG Score
8.6HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
70
EG Risk 70/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity86% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
47th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.6 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 23, 2026

Last Modified

September 23, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 23, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.7.20 - CertiK Audit Remediation & Coordinated Security Release

Patch available: klever-io/klever-go v1.7.20

https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/releases/tag/v1.7.20
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit a2740c985a78 (klever-io/klever-go)

Patch available: klever-io/klever-go v1.7.20 (contains commit a2740c985a78)

https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/commit/a2740c985a788fb69e17742ea4f0c37c440733b2
GitHub pull request Patch Available

[KLC-2438] require auth for /log and stop unauthenticated logger mutation (GHSA-9v8p-frvj-2pcm)

Patch available: klever-io/klever-go v1.7.20 (PR #74 merged 2026-07-01)

https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/pull/74
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

/log controls global node logging · Advisory · klever-io/klever-go · GitHub

https://github.com/klever-io/klever-go/security/advisories/GHSA-9v8p-frvj-2pcm

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-86064(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/klever-io/klever-go @ 1.7.20 (fixes <= 1.7.19)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/klever-io/klever-go—
  • every version up to 1.7.20: fixed in 1.7.20
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9v8p-frvj-2pcm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.6
  3. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 44 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 22:37 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 04:30 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-02 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  26. 2026-10-01 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  28. 2026-09-30 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  30. 2026-09-30 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-29 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-28 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  34. 2026-09-27 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  36. 2026-09-26 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  38. 2026-09-26 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-24 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  41. 2026-09-23 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-23 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-23 19:19 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.6 HIGH
  44. 2026-09-23 19:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-86064?
CVE-2026-86064 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 23, 2026. Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the default-open GET /log WebSocket route configured in config/node/api.yaml and registered by network/api/api.go does not require authentication. The first client message is parsed as a logger Profile in…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-86064 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-86064 was published on September 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-86064 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-86064 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-86064?
CVE-2026-86064 has a CVSS base score of 8.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-86064?
A fix for CVE-2026-86064 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-86064 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-86064

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-86064?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.