CVE-2026-86039

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-81686 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

libp2p is a JavaScript implementation of the libp2p networking stack. From 8.0.0 until 12.0.24, @libp2p/peer-store in packages/peer-store/src/index.ts uses consumePeerRecord to verify a RecordEnvelope signature but does not require PeerRecord.peerId in the signed payload to equal the signer peer ID derived by RecordEnvelope.openAndCertify. The expectedPeer option checks only the envelope signer, and the gossipsub Peer Exchange path can provide the attacker's own peer ID as expectedPeer. An attacker can therefore sign a record with the attacker's key, place a victim peer ID and attacker-controlled multiaddrs in the payload, and have certified addresses stored for the victim. The poisoned addresses can cause address-book corruption, dial redirection or failure, routing manipulation, and reachability disruption, although the connection upgrade still verifies remote peer identity and prevents a complete identity takeover. The issue is fixed in version 12.0.24.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
68
EG Risk 68/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity82% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
19th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 24, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_pr, github_commit.
GitHub release Patch Available

peer-store: v12.0.24

Patch available: libp2p/js-libp2p peer-store-v12.0.24

https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/releases/tag/peer-store-v12.0.24
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 3bf5d395cbca (libp2p/js-libp2p)

Patch available: libp2p/js-libp2p transport-interop-libp2p-main-v1.0.39 (contains commit 3bf5d395cbca)

https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/commit/3bf5d395cbca1488eea6e87cd771e4613b661c30
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix: use the same peer id to load and store peer records

Patch available: libp2p/js-libp2p transport-interop-libp2p-main-v1.0.39 (PR #3570 merged 2026-07-17)

https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/pull/3570
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

PeerStore accepts attacker-signed PeerRecords for a victim peer ID and stores certified attacker addresses · Advisory · libp2p/js-libp2p · GitHub

https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p/security/advisories/GHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-86039(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@libp2p/peer-store @ 12.0.24 (fixes >= 8.0.0, < 12.0.24)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
@libp2p/peer-store—
  • 8.0.0 up to 12.0.24: fixed in 12.0.24
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vrf4-mx87-p53w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  3. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  9. 2026-10-11 04:04 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-02 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  26. 2026-10-01 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  28. 2026-09-30 20:06 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  30. 2026-09-29 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-29 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-28 15:37 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  34. 2026-09-28 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  36. 2026-09-27 00:49 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  38. 2026-09-26 11:58 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-24 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
  41. 2026-09-24 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  43. 2026-09-22 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  45. 2026-09-22 10:16 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-21 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  48. 2026-09-21 20:59 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-20 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  51. 2026-09-19 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-18 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  54. 2026-09-17 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-17 15:25 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.2 HIGH
  56. 2026-09-17 15:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-86039?
CVE-2026-86039 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. libp2p is a JavaScript implementation of the libp2p networking stack. From 8.0.0 until 12.0.24, @libp2p/peer-store in packages/peer-store/src/index.ts uses consumePeerRecord to verify a RecordEnvelope signature but does not require PeerRecord.peerId in the signed payload to equal the signer peer ID…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-86039 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-86039 was published on September 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-86039 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-86039 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-86039?
CVE-2026-86039 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-86039?
A fix for CVE-2026-86039 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-86039 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-86039

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-86039?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.