CVE-2026-79785

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.95.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-65595 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

X-AnyLabeling's model downloader disabled TLS certificate verification. download_with_retry in anylabeling/services/auto_labeling/model.py built a context with ssl._create_unverified_context() and passed it to urllib.request.urlopen, so neither the certificate chain nor the hostname was checked on any model download, and models are fetched over HTTPS from the project's release host. Any party positioned to intercept that connection could therefore answer it with content of their own choosing. The response is written to a .part file and moved into place with os.replace, and the only post-download check, safe_check_model, validates the file's format rather than its provenance: no hash or signature is compared against an expected value. For an ONNX target the substituted file passes onnx.checker.check_model and is then used for inference, so the attacker chooses the model that produces the application's annotations. For a .pth or .pt target, which the shipped SAM2 video, YOLOE, UPN and open_vision configurations use, the check worker calls torch.load without weights_only, so a substituted file is unpickled and executes code of the attacker's choosing on PyTorch releases predating the weights_only default.

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity59% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 24, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release.
Web page

X-AnyLabeling before 4.0.0-beta.9 Improper Certificate Validation in Model Downloads | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/x-anylabeling-before-4.0.0-beta.9-improper-certificate-validation-in-model-downloads
Web page

x-anylabeling-cvhub · PyPI

https://pypi.org/project/x-anylabeling-cvhub/
Web page

X-AnyLabeling/anylabeling/services/auto_labeling/model.py at v4.0.0-beta.8 · CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling · GitHub

https://github.com/CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling/blob/v4.0.0-beta.8/anylabeling/services/auto_labeling/model.py
GitHub release Patch Available

X-AnyLabeling v4.0.0-beta.9

Patch available: CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling v4.0.0-beta.9

https://github.com/CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.9
GitHub commit

commit 52f7c30333f3 (CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling)

Fix landed in CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling commit 52f7c30333f3 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling/commit/52f7c30333f3f99711f09334d740212aa30b9958
Web page

GitHub - CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling: X-AnyLabeling: A lightweight, efficient, and unified cross-platform desktop application for annotating text, image, video, and multimodal data, combining versatile built-in tools with state-of-the-art AI models and flexible multi-format export. · GitHub

https://github.com/CVHub520/X-AnyLabeling

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-79785(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 160 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 60 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 02:25 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-22 15:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  17. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-09 08:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-08 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  21. 2026-10-06 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-06 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  23. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  26. 2026-10-03 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-03 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  28. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  29. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  30. 2026-10-02 11:03 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-02 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  32. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  33. 2026-10-01 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-01 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  35. 2026-09-30 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-30 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  37. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  38. 2026-09-29 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-29 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  40. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  41. 2026-09-28 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-28 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  43. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  44. 2026-09-26 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-26 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  46. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  47. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  48. 2026-09-24 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-24 21:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  50. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  51. 2026-09-24 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-24 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  54. 2026-09-23 11:28 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-23 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  56. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-09-22 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-22 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  59. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-09-21 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-21 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-09-20 05:21 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-20 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  65. 2026-09-19 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-19 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  67. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-09-18 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-18 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  70. 2026-09-16 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-16 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  72. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  73. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-09-15 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-15 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xmcj-8jmg-p5pr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 5.9

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-79785?
CVE-2026-79785 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. X-AnyLabeling's model downloader disabled TLS certificate verification. download_with_retry in anylabeling/services/auto_labeling/model.py built a context with ssl._create_unverified_context() and passed it to urllib.request.urlopen, so neither the certificate chain nor the hostname was checked on…
When was CVE-2026-79785 made public?
CVE-2026-79785 was made public on June 16, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-79785 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-79785 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-79785?
CVE-2026-79785 has a CVSS base score of 5.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-79785?
A fix for CVE-2026-79785 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-79785 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-79785

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-79785?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.