CVE-2026-78850

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.05.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.0 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-15. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-102185 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-rw9v-xch6-cr33 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

An issue in Matomo v.5.11.2 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the SiteContentDetector / SitesManager component. NOTE: the Supplier disputes the relevance of this report because the site administrator is a trusted party, and would not plausibly set main_url to a URL that offers additional information to an adversary.

CVSS v3
5.0
EG Score
5.0MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity50% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
26th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.0 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. No fix on record yet. Sources: github.
Web page🟡 PoC Available

GitHub - SLO-CYBER-SEC/CVE-2026-78850 · GitHub

https://github.com/SLO-CYBER-SEC/CVE-2026-78850
Web page

Privacy-first analytics you can trust - Analytics Platform - Matomo

https://matomo.org/
GitHub advisory

Security Advisories · matomo-org/matomo · GitHub

https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo/security/advisories
Web page

GitHub - matomo-org/matomo at 5.11.2 · GitHub

https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo/tree/5.11.2
Web page

GitHub - matomo-org/matomo: Empowering People Ethically 🚀 — Matomo is hiring! Join us → https://matomo.org/jobs Matomo is the leading open-source alternative to Google Analytics, giving you complete control and built-in privacy. Easily collect, visualise, and analyse data from websites & apps. Star us on GitHub ⭐️ – Pull Requests welcome! · GitHub

https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-78850(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rw9v-xch6-cr33 · GitHub CVSS 5.0
  10. 2026-10-26 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-26 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rw9v-xch6-cr33 · GitHub CVSS 5.0
  12. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-16 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rw9v-xch6-cr33 · GitHub CVSS 5.0
  24. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 5 more
  1. 2026-10-15 17:57 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.0 MEDIUM
  2. 2026-10-15 17:57 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 5 · severity → MEDIUM
  3. 2026-10-15 17:25 UTCNVD update
  4. 2026-10-15 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-15 16:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-78850?
CVE-2026-78850 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 15, 2026. An issue in Matomo v.5.11.2 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the SiteContentDetector / SitesManager component. NOTE: the Supplier disputes the relevance of this report because the site administrator is a trusted party, and would not plausibly set main_url to a URL that…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-78850 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-78850 was published on October 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-78850 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-78850 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (26th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-78850?
CVE-2026-78850 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.0 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-78850?
No fix for CVE-2026-78850 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-78850 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-78850

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-78850?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.