UltraVNC repeater through 1.8.2.2 contains an integer overflow in the HTTP request logging path. In repeater/webgui/settings.c:336, the win_log() function allocates list nodes via malloc(sizeof(struct LIST) + strlen(line)), where line is derived from HTTP request URIs. If strlen(line) is sufficiently large, the addition overflows to a value smaller than sizeof(struct LIST), causing a heap allocation smaller than required. The subsequent strcpy of the full string into the undersized allocation produces a heap buffer overflow. In the current implementation this overflow is bounded by the HTTP receive buffer size (WI_RXBUFSIZE = 153600 bytes, well below SIZE_MAX on 32-bit builds), limiting practical exploitability to a partial heap write. A remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger the theoretical overflow path by sending a maximally-sized URI in an HTTP request to the repeater HTTP port.
CVE-2026-7828
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-01. a secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3(high)
- EG Risk
- 39(Track)EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 61%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 1, 2026
Last Modified
July 9, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 1, 2026GitHub - ultravnc/UltraVNC: 👁️ UltraVNC Server, UltraVNC Viewer, UltraVNC Repeater and UltraVNC SC | Official repository: https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNC · GitHub
https://github.com/ultravnc/UltraVNCVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-7828(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-28 15:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-28 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 13:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-17 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 36 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-15 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-14 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-10 04:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-03 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-02 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-01 05:20 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-190
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-7828?
When was CVE-2026-7828 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-7828 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-7828?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-7828?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-7828
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-7828?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.