RabbitMQ amqp091-go is a Go AMQP 0.9.1 client. Prior to 1.13.0, readField in read.go reads the length of an AMQP byte-array field with type tag x into a signed int32 and passes the value directly to make when allocating the field buffer. A malicious or compromised broker can encode a value such as 0xFFFFFFFF, which becomes -1 and causes a len out of range runtime panic. The panic escapes the network reader goroutine and terminates the client process, including during connection.start server properties or message header table parsing. This issue is fixed in version 1.13.0.
CVE-2026-77412
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-80819 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4v58-74mf-rjx3 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6494 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.9
- EG Score
- 8.9HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 55EG Risk 55/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity89% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 44th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.9 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 23, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026v1.13.0
Patch available: rabbitmq/amqp091-go v1.13.0
https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/releases/tag/v1.13.0commit 669b42bf7b1d (rabbitmq/amqp091-go)
Patch available: rabbitmq/amqp091-go v1.13.0 (contains commit 669b42bf7b1d)
https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/commit/669b42bf7b1db76bc6d4973e3634247f680accbfSafely handle negative x- field length.
Patch available: rabbitmq/amqp091-go v1.13.0 (PR #344 merged 2026-06-17)
https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/pull/344Denial of Service via Malicious Field Length in AMQP Client · Advisory · rabbitmq/amqp091-go · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/security/advisories/GHSA-4v58-74mf-rjx3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-77412(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:79546Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.12.23
- RHSA-2026:79366Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.10.27
- RHSA-2026:77656Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.9.27
- GHSA-4v58-74mf-rjx3GitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
RabbitMQ amqp091-go: Denial of Service via Malicious Field Length in AMQP Client
- RHSA-2026:68290Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | quay/quay-rhel8:1791462428 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | quay/quay-rhel8:1791314514 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | quay/quay-rhel8:1790808443 | 2026-10-07 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-contrib-main-0.161.0-0.1.hum1 | 2026-09-16 | redhat |
| go | github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go @ 1.13.0 (fixes < 1.13.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-rabbitmq-amqp091-go | 1.10.0-1 ... 1.9.0-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-rabbitmq-amqp091-go | 1.10.0-1, 1.11.0-1, 1.12.0-1, 1.14.0-1, 1.15.0-1 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-rabbitmq-amqp091-go | 1.10.0-1, 1.11.0-1, 1.12.0-1 |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 130 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 30 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v58-74mf-rjx3 · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-28 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 18:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-11 03:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 18:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 05:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 18:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 09:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 09:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 12:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 03:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 16:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 00:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:golang-github-rabbitmq-amqp091-go · Go:github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:68290 · redhat:RHSA-2026:77656
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-77412?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-77412 published?
Is CVE-2026-77412 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-77412?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-77412?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-77412
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-77412?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.