Nuclei is a vulnerability scanner built on a simple YAML-based DSL. From 3.0.0 until 3.10.0, the nuclei/mysql JavaScript library does not enforce the local-file sandbox when a JavaScript template supplies the allowAllFiles MySQL DSN option. An untrusted javascript: template scanning an attacker-controlled MySQL-compatible endpoint can cause the server to issue LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE requests for arbitrary paths, after which the scanner's MySQL client reads the files and returns their contents to the server even though -allow-local-file-access is disabled. JavaScript templates can run unsigned and without the -code flag on affected versions, and the bypass affects CLI and SDK deployments that accept untrusted templates. This issue is fixed in version 3.10.0.
CVE-2026-76803
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-09-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-84553 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xhmx-w2j4-rw3q (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6577 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 24EG Risk 24/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 22, 2026
Last Modified
September 26, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 22, 2026v3.10.0
Patch available: projectdiscovery/nuclei v3.10.0
https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/releases/tag/v3.10.0commit 9611926a9a1c (projectdiscovery/nuclei)
Fix landed in projectdiscovery/nuclei commit 9611926a9a1c — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/commit/9611926a9a1ca99e8ed554d1b26fbeff60e06368gate mysql allowAllFiles behind -lfa
Fix merged in projectdiscovery/nuclei PR #7473 on 2026-06-19 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/pull/7473Local File Read via MySQL Client Sandbox Bypass · Advisory · projectdiscovery/nuclei · GitHub
https://github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/security/advisories/GHSA-xhmx-w2j4-rw3qVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-76803(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3 @ 3.10.0 (fixes >= 3.0.0, < 3.10.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(3)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei | — |
| — |
| github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v2 | — |
| — |
| github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xhmx-w2j4-rw3q · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-11-01 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-30 05:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-11 03:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 07:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 09:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 13:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-28 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-27 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-26 23:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-22 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:41 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-09-22 16:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-76803?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-76803 published?
Is CVE-2026-76803 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-76803?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-76803?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-76803
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-76803?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.