CVE-2026-66296

MEDIUMNVD 6.16.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 6.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-03. NVD baseline CVSS 6.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-52407 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS) vulnerability in lud oaskit allows reflected cross-site scripting via the default HTML error handler.

Oaskit.ErrorHandler.Default.format_reason/4 and Oaskit.ErrorHandler.Default.reason_to_html/1 in lib/oaskit/error_handler/default.ex render request-validation failures as an HTML page whenever the request's Accept header contains html, interpolating request-controlled strings into that page without HTML escaping. The unescaped values are object keys taken from a request body or from an object or deepObject query parameter, which appear in the JSON Schema error's instance path when a schema rejects them (for example under additionalProperties: false), and the raw Content-Type header, reflected in unsupported-media-type errors when it fails to parse.

Because browsers send Accept: text/html on ordinary top-level navigation, a crafted GET link is sufficient to trigger the error page; no form submission, custom Content-Type, or attacker-controlled script on the victim's side is required. A payload such as filter[alert(document.domain)]=x terminates the enclosing markup and the injected script executes in the origin of the application using oaskit, giving it access to that origin's cookies, session, and same-origin responses.

Both HTML error rendering and the vulnerable handler are enabled by default: Oaskit.Plugs.ValidateRequest defaults :html_errors to true and :error_handler to Oaskit.ErrorHandler.Default, so applications following the documented usage are affected without any opt-in.

This issue affects oaskit: from 0.1.0 before 0.14.1.

CVSS v3
6.1
EG Score
6.1MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
43
EG Risk 43/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity61% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
30th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 3, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit b70c6b2eaf0b (lud/oaskit)

Fix landed in lud/oaskit commit b70c6b2eaf0b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/lud/oaskit/commit/b70c6b2eaf0b11bdd0bbb21b8a87dbb3d46918a1
Web page

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-66296
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Reflected XSS in oaskit's default HTML error handler · Advisory · lud/oaskit · GitHub

https://github.com/lud/oaskit/security/advisories/GHSA-h7xw-x8wr-xpcc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-66296(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
oaskit0.1.0 ... 0.9.1 (23 versions)
  • 0.1.0 up to 0.14.1: fixed in 0.14.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 189 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-29 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-23 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  15. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-22 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  18. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-05 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  19. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-04 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 10:18 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-02 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  27. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  28. 2026-10-01 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-01 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  30. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  31. 2026-09-29 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-29 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  33. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  34. 2026-09-27 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-27 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  36. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  37. 2026-09-25 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-25 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  39. 2026-09-24 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-24 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  41. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  42. 2026-09-23 06:39 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-23 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  44. 2026-09-22 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-22 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  46. 2026-09-20 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-20 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  48. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  49. 2026-09-19 13:33 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-19 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  51. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  52. 2026-09-18 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-18 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  54. 2026-09-17 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-17 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  56. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  57. 2026-09-16 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-16 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  59. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  60. 2026-09-15 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  61. 2026-09-13 18:10 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-13 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  63. 2026-09-12 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-12 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  65. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  66. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  68. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  69. 2026-09-10 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  70. 2026-09-09 06:44 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-09 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  73. 2026-09-07 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-07 18:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rgx-mcq5-r7wv · GitHub CVSS 6.1
  75. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-66296?
CVE-2026-66296 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 3, 2026. Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS) vulnerability in lud oaskit allows reflected cross-site scripting via the default HTML error handler. Oaskit.ErrorHandler.Default.format_reason/4 and Oaskit.ErrorHandler.Default.reason_to_html/1 in lib/oaskit/error_handler/default.ex…
When was CVE-2026-66296 made public?
CVE-2026-66296 was made public on July 5, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Erlang Ecosystem Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 3, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-66296 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-66296 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (30th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-66296?
CVE-2026-66296 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-66296?
A fix for CVE-2026-66296 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-66296 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-66296

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-66296?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.