CVE-2026-64672

MEDIUMCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asGHSA-wv6g-x823-wx9m (GitHub Security Advisories)

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fixed version is listed under Patch Availability — apply it.

Terragrunt catalog predictable temp symlink clobber

Summary

Terragrunt's terragrunt catalog command clones each repository referenced in your catalog configuration into a temporary working directory. In affected versions, the clone path it derived was deterministic and sat under the shared system temporary directory, in the form /catalog-. Because that path was predictable and Terragrunt followed a symlink already present there instead of rejecting it, a local attacker could plant a symlink at that path and cause Terragrunt to delete a directory and re-clone into it outside the intended temporary root.

Impact

This affected users who ran terragrunt catalog on a host they shared with other local users or processes they did not fully trust, such as a multi-user server or a shared CI runner. The attack required a local attacker: a separate local user or process able to write to the shared system temporary directory. It was not remotely exploitable, and the victim had to run terragrunt catalog while the attacker's symlink was already in place.

Because the predictable path depended only on the repository URL being cataloged and the location of the system temporary directory, the attacker could compute it in advance and plant a symlink there before the victim ran the command. When the victim ran terragrunt catalog, Terragrunt followed the symlink out of the intended temporary root, deleted an existing ` directory under the attacker-chosen parent, and repopulated that path with the cloned repository contents. All of this happened in the security context of the user running Terragrunt.

The attacker controlled the parent directory the symlink pointed to, but not the leaf name: the leaf was fixed to , derived from the repository URL the victim cataloged. The primitive was deletion of an existing directory outside the temporary root, followed by a re-clone into that same path. On a single-user machine with no hostile local processes, exposure was minimal.

Affected Versions

  • Terragrunt < v1.1.1

Patches

This vulnerability has been resolved in Terragrunt version v1.1.1.

All users are strongly advised to upgrade.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, ensure that you do not allow untrusted parties to control the values of TMPDIR, TMP, and TEMP in environments where you run terragrunt catalog.

Technical Details

When you run terragrunt catalog, the catalog service iterates over the repositories in your configuration and prepares a local clone of each one. In affected versions, for a given repository URL it built a clone path by hashing the URL and joining the result under the shared system temporary directory:

/catalog-

This path was fully determined by the repository URL and the location of the system temporary directory, so anyone else on the machine who knew which repository a victim would catalog could compute it in advance. The catalog service passed this path into its clone preparation step.

As a result, an attacker who placed a symlink at /catalog- pointing at a directory of their choosing caused both the removal and the re-clone to operate through that symlink. Both landed at /, outside the intended temporary root.

Terragrunt v1.1.1` no longer derives a predictable clone path, so an attacker can no longer position a symlink at a location known in advance.

Credit

We would like to thank (@br0x2) for discovering and responsibly disclosing this vulnerability.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
Unknown (no EPSS on record)Unknown, not low: FIRST has published no EPSS probability for this CVE.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64672(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terragrunt @ 1.1.1 (fixes < 1.1.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 4× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wv6g-x823-wx9m · GitHub severity MODERATE
  2. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-15 18:28 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-64672?
CVE-2026-64672 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 15, 2026. Terragrunt catalog predictable temp symlink clobber Summary Terragrunt's terragrunt catalog command clones each repository referenced in your catalog configuration into a temporary working directory. In affected versions, the clone path it derived was deterministic and sat under the shared system…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64672 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64672 was published on October 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64672?
A fixed version for CVE-2026-64672 is listed under Patch Availability on this page: update to the version listed for your package. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64672 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-64672

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64672?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.