CVE-2026-64098

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-45783 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates

virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update() and virtio_gpu_resource_flush() lock the framebuffer BO's dma_resv via virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv() and ignore its return value. The function can fail with -EINTR from dma_resv_lock_interruptible() (signal during lock wait) or with -ENOMEM from dma_resv_reserve_fences() (fence slot allocation), leaving the resv lock not held. The queue path then walks the object array and calls dma_resv_add_fence(), which requires the lock held; with lockdep enabled this trips dma_resv_assert_held():

WARNING: drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c:296 at dma_resv_add_fence+0x71e/0x840 Call Trace: virtio_gpu_array_add_fence virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail commit_tail drm_atomic_helper_commit drm_atomic_commit drm_atomic_helper_update_plane __setplane_atomic drm_mode_cursor_universal drm_mode_cursor_common drm_mode_cursor_ioctl drm_ioctl __x64_sys_ioctl

Beyond the WARN, mutating the dma_resv fence list without the lock races with concurrent readers/writers and can corrupt the list.

Both call sites run inside the .atomic_update plane callback, which DRM atomic helpers do not allow to fail (by the time it runs, the commit has been signed off to userspace and there is no clean rollback path). Moving the lock acquisition to .prepare_fb was rejected because the broader lock scope deadlocks against other BO locking paths in the same atomic commit.

Introduce virtio_gpu_lock_one_resv_uninterruptible() that uses dma_resv_lock() instead of dma_resv_lock_interruptible(). This eliminates the -EINTR failure mode -- the realistic syzbot trigger -- without extending the lock hold across the commit. The helper locks a single BO and rejects nents > 1 with -EINVAL; both fix sites lock exactly one BO.

Use it from virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update() and virtio_gpu_resource_flush(); check the return value to handle the remaining -ENOMEM case from dma_resv_reserve_fences() by freeing the objs and skipping the plane update for that frame. The framebuffer BOs touched here are not shared with other contexts and lock contention is expected to be brief, so the loss of signal-interruptibility is acceptable.

Other callers of virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv() (the ioctl paths) continue to use the interruptible variant.

The bug was reported by syzbot, triggered via fault injection (fail_nth) on the DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CURSOR path, which forces the -ENOMEM branch in dma_resv_reserve_fences().

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c86077d512ee980cc91322211d35dbcd3175f64c
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2359a411b15f495d12cfda6a7db6855ebb7f90f
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9af1b6e175c82daf4b423da339a722d8e67a735a
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fadd01cf461fee5bb11506621339c548447e5c7
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7930eee22cd3df61e85be8aa512032ab303b7167
Web page

drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21ab64c77a30d56efc506c8fa2ad8959f8ce3d36

Patch Availability(22)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1059.60~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1067.75) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2053.55) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1067.75+fips1) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1067.75~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1067.75~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-139.139.1~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.67+fips1) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1064.67) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1066.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.52.1.el9_82026-09-25redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.60.1.el10_22026-09-24redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 312 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 212 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-27 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-27 17:57 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-27 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-19 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-19 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-19 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-19 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-19 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-19 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-16 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 17:18 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-16 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-16 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-16 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-16 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  11. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  29. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 3rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  36. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  37. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  41. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-17 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-17 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-17 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  48. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  51. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  52. 2026-09-14 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-14 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-14 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-09-13 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-13 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-13 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-13 03:23 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-13 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  60. 2026-09-12 10:04 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-12 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  66. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  67. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  70. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  71. 2026-09-06 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-06 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-09-05 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-05 22:45 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-05 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9phf-m556-w4xg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64098?
CVE-2026-64098 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/virtio: use uninterruptible resv lock for plane updates virtio_gpu_cursor_plane_update() and virtio_gpu_resource_flush() lock the framebuffer BO's dma_resv via virtio_gpu_array_lock_resv() and ignore its return value. The…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64098 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64098 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64098 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64098 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64098?
CVE-2026-64098 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64098?
A fix for CVE-2026-64098 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64098 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64098

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64098?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.