CVE-2026-63934

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-45707 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location

itg3200_read_all_channels() takes __be16 *buf' as a parameter and fills the i2c_msg destination as (char *)&buf'. Since buf' is the parameter (a pointer), &buf' is the address of the local pointer slot on the stack of itg3200_read_all_channels(), not the address of the caller's scan buffer. The (char *) cast hides the type mismatch.

i2c_transfer() therefore writes ITG3200_SCAN_ELEMENTS * sizeof(s16) = 8 bytes into the parameter's stack slot, which is discarded when the function returns. The caller's scan buffer in itg3200_trigger_handler() is never written to, so iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp() pushes uninitialised stack contents to userspace via /dev/iio:deviceX every scan -- both a functional bug (no actual gyroscope or temperature data is delivered through the triggered buffer) and an information leak.

The non-buffered read_raw() path is unaffected: it goes through itg3200_read_reg_s16() which uses &out' on a local s16 value, where that is correct.

Drop the spurious &' so the i2c read writes into the caller's buffer.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cfc3283859cfdeacadf80d5e6880bdf871ffeaa6
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b64dd5f3b38911054cbcc570df617e3e8e75e562
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90e809376b0f0d1ddec2eec954aecdd2a5b40b0e
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8654b5e2617819ff4f7c78071dfd0275e971a9b6
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6bdc3023d62ed5c7d591f0eb27a5adb37fb892ae
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63203bd072b613c18c237b906b1c9d2dc4527337
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31bbd4b87dd6701fa10e03ba7f6268e49e178d16
Web page

iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15a0b3f33ffb6c78b3de6f69b026ceb09b973dd1

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63934(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1112.112) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1070.78) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-146.146) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1080 (5.15.0-1080.84) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1066.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1070.78+fips1) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1070.78) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.66) @ noble2026-10-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 5.10.259 (fixes >=3.9.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.259-1: fixed in 5.10.259-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 155 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 55 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 14:47 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.1 HIGH
  5. 2026-10-30 14:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-30 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  7. 2026-10-30 14:46 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  8. 2026-10-29 17:11 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-29 17:11 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-29 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  11. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-25 00:55 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-01 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  25. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  26. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-28 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  29. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  30. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  31. 2026-09-23 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-23 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  33. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  36. 2026-09-16 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-16 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  38. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-11 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  41. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  43. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  44. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  45. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  46. 2026-09-05 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-05 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  48. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  49. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  50. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  51. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  52. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 02:56 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-30 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  56. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  57. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  58. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  59. 2026-08-27 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-27 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  61. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  62. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  63. 2026-08-24 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-24 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  65. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  66. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  67. 2026-08-21 00:01 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-21 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  69. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  70. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  71. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  72. 2026-08-17 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-17 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xvpq-5jw7-83gf
  74. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  75. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63934?
CVE-2026-63934 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iio: gyro: itg3200: fix i2c read into the wrong stack location itg3200_read_all_channels() takes __be16 *buf' as a parameter and fills the i2c_msg destination as (char *)&buf'. Since buf' is the parameter (a pointer), &buf' is the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63934 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63934 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63934 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63934 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63934?
CVE-2026-63934 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63934?
A fix for CVE-2026-63934 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63934 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63934

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63934?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.