CVE-2026-63877

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-45762 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device

Prevent a crash from happening as the first serial port is initialised:

Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x64 tgafb: SFB+ detected, rev=0x02 fb0: Digital ZLX-E1 frame buffer device at 0x1e000000 DECstation DZ serial driver version 1.04 CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000000bc, epc == 8048b3a4, ra == 80470a78 Oops[#1]: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.19.0-dirty #35 NONE $ 0 : 00000000 1000ac00 00000004 804707ac $ 4 : 00000000 80e20850 80e20858 81000030 $ 8 : 00000000 8072c81c 00000008 fefefeff $12 : 6c616972 00000006 80c5917f 69726420 $16 : 80e20800 00000000 808f8968 80e20800 $20 : 00000000 807f5a90 808b0094 808d3bc8 $24 : 00000018 80479030 $28 : 80c2e000 80c2fd70 00000069 80470a78 Hi : 00000004 Lo : 00000000 epc : 8048b3a4 __dev_fwnode+0x0/0xc ra : 80470a78 serial_base_ctrl_add+0xa0/0x168 Status: 1000ac04 IEp Cause : 30000008 (ExcCode 02) BadVA : 000000bc PrId : 00000220 (R3000) Modules linked in: Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=(ptrval), task=(ptrval), tls=00000000) Stack : 00400044 00400040 8046f4cc 00000000 808a6148 808a0000 808f8968 8086983c 808e0000 8046fc84 1000ac01 00000028 80e20700 802ba3f8 80e20700 80d34a94 80c1b900 80e20700 80e20700 80e20700 80e20700 80444650 00000000 00000000 00000000 807f5a90 808b0094 80447080 00400040 808e0000 80d34a94 808a6148 80d34a94 00000004 80e20700 00000000 8076974c 80469810 80c2fe3c 1000ac01 ... Call Trace: [<8048b3a4>] __dev_fwnode+0x0/0xc [<80470a78>] serial_base_ctrl_add+0xa0/0x168 [<8046fc84>] serial_core_register_port+0x1c8/0x974 [<808c6af0>] dz_init+0x74/0xc8 [<800470e0>] do_one_initcall+0x44/0x2d4 [<808b111c>] kernel_init_freeable+0x258/0x308 [<8072e434>] kernel_init+0x20/0x114 [<80049cd0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c

Code: 27bd0018 03e00008 2402ffea <8c8200bc> 03e00008 00000000 27bdffc0 afbe0038 afb30024

---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

-- where a pointer is dereferenced that has been derived from a null pointer to the port's parent device.

Since no device is available with legacy probing and it's not anymore a preferable way to discover devices anyway, switch the driver to using a platform device and use it as the port's parent device. Update resource handling accordingly and only request the actual span of addresses used within the slot, which will have had its resource already requested by generic platform device code.

Use platform_driver_probe() not just because the DZ device is fixed with solder on board and not straightforward to remove, but foremost because the associated TTY's major device number is the same as used by the zs driver and the first driver to claim it will prevent the other one from using it. Either one DZ device or some SCC devices will be present in a given system but never both at a time, and therefore we want the major device number to be claimed by the first driver to actually successfully bind to its device and platform_driver_probe() is a way to fulfil that.

An unfortunate consequence of the switch to a platform device is we now hand the console over from the bootconsole much later in the bootstrap. The firmware console handler appears good enough though to work so late and in particular with interrupts enabled.

Conversely only starting the console port so late lets the reset code fully utilise our delay handlers, so switch from udelay() to fsleep() for transmitter draining so as to avoid busy-waiting for an excessive amount of time.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9e78361fe92fb64662fc3c8f34e2cdbb8c25bc6
Web page

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f59646229490a93cda950017ad4bdfbfe770a1d
Web page

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d7a49d60b8fda66da60e240fd7315232fa1754f
Web page

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c9fb95c8d6430d11dbb7b44fbe23222585cda86
Web page

serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ff0401ffddaccc85f758c8259912d686d052b31

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63877(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 150 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 50 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 15:06 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  4. 2026-10-30 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  5. 2026-10-30 15:06 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  6. 2026-10-29 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-29 17:13 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-29 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  9. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-25 02:55 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  23. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-28 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-23 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  31. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  32. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-16 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  36. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-11 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  39. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  40. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  41. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  42. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  44. 2026-09-05 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-05 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  46. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  47. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  48. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  49. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 02:59 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-30 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  53. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  54. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  55. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  56. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  57. 2026-08-25 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-25 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  59. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  61. 2026-08-22 10:47 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-22 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  63. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  64. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  65. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  66. 2026-08-19 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-19 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  68. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  69. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  70. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  71. 2026-08-16 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-16 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jxmf-qg37-hfx7
  73. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  74. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  75. 2026-08-12 19:27 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63877?
CVE-2026-63877 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: dz: Convert to use a platform device Prevent a crash from happening as the first serial port is initialised: Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x64 tgafb: SFB+ detected, rev=0x02 fb0: Digital ZLX-E1 frame…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63877 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63877 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63877 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63877 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63877?
CVE-2026-63877 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63877?
A fix for CVE-2026-63877 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63877 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63877

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63877?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.