ws before 8.21.1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in lib/receiver.js where the fragment guard only triggers when fragment count reaches maxFragments, allowing attackers to exhaust memory by sending incomplete fragmented WebSocket messages. Attackers can send a text frame with FIN=0 followed by continuation frames without completing the sequence, causing each fragment to be stored as a separate Buffer object with significant overhead, enabling denial of service through heap exhaustion.
CVE-2026-62389
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS
- 36.7%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 15, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026ws < 8.21.1 Default maxFragments Allows Memory Exhaustion DoS | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ws-default-maxfragments-allows-memory-exhaustion-dosRelease 8.21.1 (websockets/ws)
Patch available: websockets/ws 8.21.1
https://github.com/websockets/ws/releases/tag/8.21.1Default maxFragments still allows memory-exhaustion DoS (incomplete GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p fix) · Issue #2331 · websockets/ws · GitHub
https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/2331commit f197ac651409 (websockets/ws)
Patch available: websockets/ws 8.21.1 (contains commit f197ac651409)
https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/f197ac65140920bdcecdab74bfc69c2d7858e55dVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-62389(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-17 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-16 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-15 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-15 17:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-62389?
When was CVE-2026-62389 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-62389 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62389?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-62389?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-62389
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-62389?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.