The ixo Blockchain is a Layer 1 blockchain that runs on both Testnet and Mainnet. Prior to version 8.0.0, the x/bonds module moved funds from an address that was resolved from a DID verification method, without verifying that the resolved address belonged to the transaction signer. Affected handlers included MsgMakeOutcomePayment, MsgBuy, MsgSell, MsgSwap, and MsgWithdrawShare, as well as the batch order processor. Because any account may list an arbitrary blockchainAccountID as a verification method on a DID it controls (without the consent of that address's owner), an attacker could register victims' addresses as verification methods on their own DID and then move the victims' balances into a bond the attacker controlled — later withdrawing and bridging the proceeds off-chain. This was exploited on ixo mainnet (ixo-5) on 2026-06-20. The attack required no victim keys, signatures, or system compromise — any account holding a balance in a token a bond could use was at risk. This was fixed in v8.0.0, delivered via the on-chain v8 software-upgrade. The x/bonds module is disabled: every bonds message is rejected on all routes (top-level, authz, CosmWasm, and ICA), and the bonds batch EndBlocker is a no-op so no further reserve movements can occur. All node operators and validators must upgrade to v8.0.0. The flaw is in chain state-machine logic and can only be remediated by running the patched binary. There is no application-level workaround. The vulnerability is in consensus logic; remediation requires the network to run the patched (v8.0.0) binary. The bonds module remains disabled in v8.0.0 and will only be re-enabled in a future release once the signer-authorization model has been corrected.
CVE-2026-61604
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-86330 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-w3rp-4cm2-4wgc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 57EG Risk 57/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity93% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.3% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 24, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026x/bonds DID-resolved payer drain + x/entity ICA authorization bypass · Advisory · ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain · GitHub
Affected: v8.0.0, delivered via the on-chain v8 software-upgrade. The x/bonds module is dis
https://github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/security/advisories/GHSA-w3rp-4cm2-4wgcVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61604(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(7)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v3 | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v4 | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v5 | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v6 | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v7 | — | ghsa |
| go | github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v8 @ 8.0.0 (fixes < 8.0.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(7)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v3 | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v4 | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v5 | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v6 | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v7 | — |
| — |
| github.com/ixofoundation/ixo-blockchain/v8 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 17:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w3rp-4cm2-4wgc · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w3rp-4cm2-4wgc · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-31 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-30 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-29 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-28 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-27 14:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-26 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 13:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-24 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-23 12:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-22 12:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 58 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-21 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-20 11:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-19 11:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-14 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-11 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-09 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-08 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-08 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-05 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-05 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-03 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-02 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-09-30 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-09-29 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-09-27 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 16th percentile
- 2026-09-26 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 17:52 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.3 CRITICAL
- 2026-09-24 17:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61604?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-61604 published?
Is CVE-2026-61604 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61604?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61604?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-61604
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61604?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.