CVE-2026-60093

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-24. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-64954 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7jwc-q3fj-c9pq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake component

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.

The camel-azure-storage-datalake component can download an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 file to the local filesystem through its downloadToFile operation, writing into the directory named by the fileDir endpoint option. DataLakeFileOperations.downloadToFile built the local target by joining fileDir with the remote path name exactly as the Azure SDK reported it (new File(fileDir, fileClientWrapper.getFileName())) and passed the result straight to the SDK download call, with no lexical normalization and no check that the resolved location stayed inside fileDir. The remote name is not route-controlled data: the consumer enumerates the filesystem in DataLakeConsumer.createBatchExchangesFromPath, which lists paths and creates one exchange per entry from PathItem.getName() verbatim, applying no name filtering by default. A path name containing parent-directory segments therefore resolved to a location outside the configured fileDir, letting anyone able to influence the names present in the consumed Data Lake filesystem cause Camel to create or overwrite a file at a location of their choosing, with the privileges of the Camel process. Depending on what the process can write to, overwriting a file outside the download directory can escalate beyond the loss of integrity of that file. The fileDir option is an ordinary common-group configuration parameter and carries no security marker, so nothing signalled to users that its value was not being enforced as a containment boundary. Camel's other file-download consumers - camel-file, camel-ftp, camel-smb, camel-mina-sftp and camel-azure-files - already constrained their local downloads to the configured directory using a path-segment boundary check; the camel-azure-storage-datalake download path was not covered by that work.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, constrain the names the consumer will act on using the regex endpoint option, which is applied to each listed path name as a full-string match, so that only simple single-segment names are accepted and any name carrying a path separator or a parent-directory segment is filtered out before an exchange is created. Alternatively, avoid the downloadToFile operation on untrusted filesystems and write the payload from the route under a file name the route itself controls, rather than one taken from the remote listing. As defence in depth, treat the object names in any externally writable Data Lake filesystem as untrusted input and do not derive local filesystem paths from them.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
14th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 12, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-60093 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-60093.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-60093(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-azure-storage-datalake4.19.0, 4.20.0, 4.21.0
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.14.9: fixed in 4.14.9
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.4: fixed in 4.18.4
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.22.0: fixed in 4.22.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 117 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 17 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 08:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  22. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  20. 2026-10-02 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-29 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-27 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  30. 2026-09-25 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-24 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  33. 2026-09-23 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-22 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-21 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  37. 2026-09-20 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-19 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  40. 2026-09-18 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  42. 2026-09-17 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  44. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  45. 2026-09-15 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  47. 2026-09-14 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  49. 2026-09-13 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-12 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  52. 2026-09-11 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  54. 2026-09-09 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  56. 2026-09-07 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  58. 2026-09-06 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  60. 2026-09-05 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-04 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  63. 2026-09-02 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  65. 2026-09-01 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  67. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  68. 2026-08-31 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  70. 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  72. 2026-08-29 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  74. 2026-08-28 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7jwc-q3fj-c9pq · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  75. 2026-08-27 18:04 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-60093?
CVE-2026-60093 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 24, 2026. Relative path traversal vulnerability in Apache Camel Azure-Storage Datalake component This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-azure-storage-datalake component can download an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 file to the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-60093 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-60093 was published on August 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-60093 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-60093 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (14th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-60093?
CVE-2026-60093 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-60093?
A fix for CVE-2026-60093 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-60093 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-60093

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-60093?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.