CVE-2026-60090

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-43175 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q65p-7p84-495c (GitHub Security Advisories) · GHSA-wf65-4jjx-q444 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI before 4.6.78 fails to validate the caller-controlled dimension argument in the PGVector and Cassandra knowledge-store create_collection() backends. Although schema, keyspace, and collection-name identifiers are validated, the dimension value (declared as int but not enforced at runtime) is interpolated directly into the vector column of the generated CREATE TABLE DDL. A caller able to influence collection-creation dimensions can pass a string such as '3); DROP TABLE tenant_secrets; --' to inject SQL/CQL tokens into the statement executed by the database driver.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 11, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

PGVector and Cassandra knowledge stores interpolate vector dimensions into DDL · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-wf65-4jjx-q444
Web page

PraisonAI before 4.6.78 SQL/CQL Injection via vector dimension | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/praisonai-before-sql-cql-injection-via-vector-dimension
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 3aa9cbc2bd49 (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.158 (contains commit 3aa9cbc2bd49)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/3aa9cbc2bd49c23a32be0a89a5e620d13d843eab

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-60090(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pippraisonai @ 4.6.78 (fixes <= 4.6.77)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonai0.0.1 ... 4.6.9 (763 versions)
  • every version up to 4.6.78: fixed in 4.6.78
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 417 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 317 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wf65-4jjx-q444 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  3. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wf65-4jjx-q444 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  5. 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-31 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-29 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-28 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-26 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-25 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-23 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-22 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-19 11:33 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-17 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-15 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  26. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  27. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  28. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  29. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  30. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  31. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  32. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  33. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  34. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  35. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  36. 2026-10-01 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-01 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  39. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  40. 2026-09-28 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-28 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  43. 2026-09-24 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-24 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  46. 2026-09-23 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-09-23 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-23 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  50. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  51. 2026-09-18 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-09-18 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-18 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  55. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  56. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  57. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  58. 2026-09-14 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-09-14 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-09-13 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-13 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  63. 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-09-13 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-09-13 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-13 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-09-12 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-09-12 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-12 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  71. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  73. 2026-09-08 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-08 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-60090?
CVE-2026-60090 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 11, 2026. PraisonAI before 4.6.78 fails to validate the caller-controlled dimension argument in the PGVector and Cassandra knowledge-store create_collection() backends. Although schema, keyspace, and collection-name identifiers are validated, the dimension value (declared as int but not enforced at runtime)…
When was CVE-2026-60090 made public?
CVE-2026-60090 was made public on June 25, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 11, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-60090 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-60090 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-60090?
CVE-2026-60090 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-60090?
A fix for CVE-2026-60090 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-60090 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-60090

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-60090?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.