Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.17 and 8.0.6, HTTP SWF decompression with the non-default swf-decompression feature and an unsafe decompress-depth can use the configured depth when allocating in src/util-file-decompression.c instead of limiting the allocation to the Flash file's actual data requirement. A crafted SWF response can therefore trigger an integer-related heap buffer overflow and crash Suricata; the default disabled feature and default depth are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 8.0.6 and 7.0.17.
CVE-2026-57226
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-83381 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 27EG Risk 27/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity59% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 48th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Sep 28, 2026Security #8642: detect/file_data: heap buffer overflow in SWF decompression depth handling - Suricata - Open Information Security Foundation
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8642swf: heap buffer overflow in SWF decompression depth handling · Advisory · OISF/suricata · GitHub
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-p33j-r48q-3jcf8.0.6
Patch available: OISF/suricata suricata-8.0.6
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.67.0.17
Patch available: OISF/suricata suricata-7.0.17
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-7.0.17next/1404/20260622/v1
Fix merged in OISF/suricata PR #15704 on 2026-06-23 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/15704commit d9fae1843250 (OISF/suricata)
Fix landed in OISF/suricata commit d9fae1843250 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/d9fae18432501674338e28bd33e35788c95d4a98commit b63224871b0f (OISF/suricata)
Patch available: OISF/suricata suricata-8.0.6 (contains commit b63224871b0f)
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/b63224871b0f8b0b1f7b8c22d05ba8a5c5f69fbbcommit 82af0aeb7cec (OISF/suricata)
Patch available: OISF/suricata suricata-7.0.17 (contains commit 82af0aeb7cec)
https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/82af0aeb7cec39e206a9ca96c4966425eddeaa74Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| suricata | 1:7.0.10-1 ... 1:8.0.7-2~exp1 (29 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| suricata | 1:7.0.10-1 ... 1:8.0.6-1~bpo13+1 (21 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-30 10:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-22 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-08 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-07 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-06 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-05 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-04 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-03 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-02 10:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-01 12:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-29 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-28 18:40 UTCEG score recompute▲ 2.20
- 2026-09-28 18:40 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.9 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-22 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 20:10 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 3.7 LOW
- 2026-09-18 20:09 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:13:suricata
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57226?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57226 published?
Is CVE-2026-57226 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57226?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57226?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57226
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57226?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.