RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 4.1.11 and 4.2.6 on Windows, the RabbitMQ management plugin static file handler rabbit_mgmt_wm_static can pass URL-encoded backslashes to erl_prim_loader:read_file_info before path validation when multiple management extension plugins are enabled, causing outbound DNS and SMB requests to attacker-controlled UNC paths. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.11 and 4.2.6.
CVE-2026-57211
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-43016 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 61EG Risk 61/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
October 25, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026UNC SSRF affecting RabbitMQ management UI on Windows · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-7v84-m3g5-vxq6RabbitMQ 4.2.6
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.6
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6Management plugin: apply path filtering earlier
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15803 on 2026-03-23 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15803commit 6730797f6a34 (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 6730797f6a34 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/6730797f6a34b4e8308cea60adf1243857e70204commit 39c3a8e9c71d (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 39c3a8e9c71d — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/39c3a8e9c71da0403d8dfc13f700e60c936e3682Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57211(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-57211Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
RabbitMQ: UNC SSRF affecting the management UI on Windows
- RHSA-2026:35940Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:35939Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.2-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-2-main-4.2.8-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 403 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 303 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-11-01 00:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 00:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-31 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-30 05:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-29 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-28 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-27 11:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-26 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-25 15:26 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-23 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-22 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-22 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-21 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-20 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-19 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-17 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-16 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-15 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-14 08:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-13 04:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-23 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:35939
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57211?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57211 published?
Is CVE-2026-57211 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57211?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57211?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-57211
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57211?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.