CVE-2026-55658

HIGHPre-NVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-70522 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Gardens v2 is a modular governance framework that enables communities to create and manage multiple governance pools with customizable parameters and voting mechanisms. In 3e595f3 and prior, when a streaming proposal is funded, the cluster of streaming contracts moves real pool funds into the proposal's StreamingEscrow to back the Superfluid constant flow agreement (the CFA deposit, plus a 0.5 percent margin). cancelProposal then zeroes the escrow's GDA member units but never reclaims that parked balance, and the permissionless claim() forwards the escrow's entire balance, including the pool funded buffer, to the beneficiary. The beneficiary is chosen by the proposal submitter and defaults to the submitter. The only path that returns escrow funds to the pool is drainToStrategy, which is onlyStrategy and is reached solely from the dispute reject ruling, never from cancel or natural completion. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
7.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity77% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
22nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 3, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

StreamingEscrow buffer drains to the proposal beneficiary on cancel via the permissionless claim() · Advisory · 1Hive/gardens-v2 · GitHub

https://github.com/1Hive/gardens-v2/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvq-5xmf-f377

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 101 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1 oldest row on record is not shown and was not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-10-17 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  22. 2026-10-02 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  28. 2026-09-30 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  30. 2026-09-29 08:44 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-28 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  33. 2026-09-27 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  35. 2026-09-26 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  37. 2026-09-26 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-24 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  40. 2026-09-23 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-09-22 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-21 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-20 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-09-19 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-18 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-09-17 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  51. 2026-09-16 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-09-16 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  55. 2026-09-15 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-09-13 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-09-12 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-11 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-09-10 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-09-08 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-09-08 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-09-06 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-05 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-05 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-04 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-03 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-03 15:24 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.7 HIGH

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55658?
CVE-2026-55658 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 3, 2026. Gardens v2 is a modular governance framework that enables communities to create and manage multiple governance pools with customizable parameters and voting mechanisms. In 3e595f3 and prior, when a streaming proposal is funded, the cluster of streaming contracts moves real pool funds into the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55658 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55658 was published on September 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55658 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55658 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55658?
CVE-2026-55658 has a CVSS base score of 7.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55658?
No fix for CVE-2026-55658 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-55658

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55658?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.