Gardens v2 is a modular governance framework that enables communities to create and manage multiple governance pools with customizable parameters and voting mechanisms. In 3e595f3 and prior, when a streaming proposal is funded, the cluster of streaming contracts moves real pool funds into the proposal's StreamingEscrow to back the Superfluid constant flow agreement (the CFA deposit, plus a 0.5 percent margin). cancelProposal then zeroes the escrow's GDA member units but never reclaims that parked balance, and the permissionless claim() forwards the escrow's entire balance, including the pool funded buffer, to the beneficiary. The beneficiary is chosen by the proposal submitter and defaults to the submitter. The only path that returns escrow funds to the pool is drainToStrategy, which is onlyStrategy and is reached solely from the dispute reject ruling, never from cancel or natural completion. At time of publication, there are no publicly known patches.
CVE-2026-55658
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-70522 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 7.7
- EG Score
- 7.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 51EG Risk 51/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity77% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 3, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026StreamingEscrow buffer drains to the proposal beneficiary on cancel via the permissionless claim() · Advisory · 1Hive/gardens-v2 · GitHub
https://github.com/1Hive/gardens-v2/security/advisories/GHSA-jwvq-5xmf-f377Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 101 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1 oldest row on record is not shown and was not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-23 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-17 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-09 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-09 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-07 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-06 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-05 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-04 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-02 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-10-02 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-30 02:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-29 08:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-27 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-26 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-26 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
- 2026-09-23 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-22 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-19 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-17 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-16 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-16 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-15 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-13 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-12 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-10 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-08 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-06 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-06 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 15:24 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.7 HIGH
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55658?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55658 published?
Is CVE-2026-55658 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55658?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55658?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-55658
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55658?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.