CVE-2026-55209

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-77802 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

resdata is software for reading and writing result files from the Eclipse reservoir simulator. Prior to 6.2.9, resdata insufficiently validates numeric fields, grid dimensions, keyword sizes, and array indexes while parsing untrusted GRDECL files in lib/resdata/rd_kw_grdecl.cpp and lib/resdata/rd_grid.cpp. Malformed COORD, ZCORN, CORSNUM, ACTNUM, or MAPAXES data can reach rd_grid_alloc_GRDECL_kw__ with inconsistent lengths, while unbounded floating-point conversion can exceed the intended parser buffer. In a network service that accepts untrusted GRDECL files, these conditions can cause a classic buffer overflow, out-of-bounds reads, invalid array access, NULL pointer dereference, memory corruption, or service termination. This issue is fixed in version 6.2.9.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
55th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_commit, github_pr.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'), Improper Validation of Array Index, NULL Pointer Dereference and Out-of-bounds Read in resdata · Advisory · equinor/resdata · GitHub

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/security/advisories/GHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x
GitHub release Patch Available

6.2.9

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/releases/tag/6.2.9
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Backport to 6.2

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (PR #1166 merged 2026-05-18)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/pull/1166
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit ee8cc12b026d (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit ee8cc12b026d)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/ee8cc12b026d945df3077bc98e211ee45f80a433
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit d3f45828e941 (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit d3f45828e941)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/d3f45828e9413506b8e8160a9304f4b7b06dcefc
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 9f8fd6db472e (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit 9f8fd6db472e)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/9f8fd6db472e0696080b768389914d60a453904f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55209(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipresdata @ 6.2.9 (fixes < 6.2.9)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
resdata3.0.1 ... 6.2.8 (29 versions)
  • every version up to 6.2.9: fixed in 6.2.9
—

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  5. 2026-10-31 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  13. 2026-10-27 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  15. 2026-10-26 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  20. 2026-10-24 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  22. 2026-10-23 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  24. 2026-10-22 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
Show 68 more
  1. 2026-10-21 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 11:42 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  9. 2026-10-17 07:41 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  26. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  27. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  28. 2026-10-06 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  30. 2026-10-06 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  34. 2026-10-03 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  36. 2026-10-02 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  38. 2026-10-02 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  40. 2026-09-30 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  42. 2026-09-30 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  44. 2026-09-28 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  46. 2026-09-27 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  48. 2026-09-27 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  50. 2026-09-24 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-23 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  54. 2026-09-22 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-21 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-20 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  58. 2026-09-19 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-18 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  61. 2026-09-17 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  67. 2026-09-14 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-18 20:42 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55209?
CVE-2026-55209 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 18, 2026. resdata is software for reading and writing result files from the Eclipse reservoir simulator. Prior to 6.2.9, resdata insufficiently validates numeric fields, grid dimensions, keyword sizes, and array indexes while parsing untrusted GRDECL files in lib/resdata/rd_kw_grdecl.cpp and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55209 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55209 was published on August 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55209 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55209 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (55th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55209?
CVE-2026-55209 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55209?
A fix for CVE-2026-55209 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-55209 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55209

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55209?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.