CVE-2026-55178

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-78775 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p23g-mvhj-jh3j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

GeoLens is a self-hosted geospatial data catalog with semantic search, OGC and STAC APIs, and a map builder. Prior to 1.2.3, multiple read and link endpoints authorize only the resource named in the request URL and fail to re-authorize a second caller-influenced dataset reached through a relationship, map layer, VRT source, externalId lookup, or request body. When a public map references a private dataset, anonymous callers can use GET /maps/{id} and GET /maps/{id}/style.json to obtain the private layer's metadata, sampled values, or vector tiles. The style response can expose a replayable HMAC tile URL that is bound to neither a user nor a map. When a public source dataset has a relationship to a private target dataset, anonymous callers can use the dataset relationship APIs to enumerate the relationship and read rows from the private target's backing table. Anonymous callers can also use GET /collections/datasets/items with an externalId dataset UUID to obtain metadata for any private, restricted, or unpublished dataset because that lookup performs no visibility check. Authenticated users with the default editor role can mosaic another user's private raster into an owned VRT and read its pixels, and POST /ai/metadata/{summary,keywords,lineage,quality-statement} accepts a body-controlled dataset_id without a visibility check and returns private metadata and sample values. Pre-existing vrt_source_links also expose unauthorized member metadata and health unless each member is filtered at read time. These paths can disclose vector geometries and attributes, raster pixels, table rows, table names, column schemas, feature counts, extents, source URLs and filenames, contacts, and sampled row values. This issue is fixed in version 1.2.3.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 31a103b96b9f (geolens-io/geolens)

Fix landed in geolens-io/geolens commit 31a103b96b9f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/commit/31a103b96b9fd6ad90308b3e27a581852c4a69bd
GitHub commit

commit 2c031da8e753 (geolens-io/geolens)

Fix landed in geolens-io/geolens commit 2c031da8e753 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/commit/2c031da8e753639ff0e36d47ca05bbb96fbe4a9e
GitHub commit

commit 07dfb1c63ecf (geolens-io/geolens)

Fix landed in geolens-io/geolens commit 07dfb1c63ecf — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/commit/07dfb1c63ecfc065c0c47b7718ec6ebe97798b1e
GitHub commit

commit 01bc87da03a5 (geolens-io/geolens)

Fix landed in geolens-io/geolens commit 01bc87da03a5 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/commit/01bc87da03a5ecd0322c42388f4bfced7cb2ed06
GitHub pull request

fix(ai): authorize the requested dataset on AI metadata endpoints (SEC-D)

Fix merged in geolens-io/geolens PR #238 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/pull/238
GitHub pull request

fix(vrt): authorize VRT source datasets at link time + filter unauthorized members on read (SEC-C/SEC-E)

Fix merged in geolens-io/geolens PR #237 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/pull/237
GitHub pull request

fix(ogc): enforce dataset visibility on the externalId OGC item lookup (SEC-B)

Fix merged in geolens-io/geolens PR #236 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/pull/236
GitHub pull request

fix(maps): re-authorize each layer's dataset on anonymous map read endpoints (SEC-A)

Fix merged in geolens-io/geolens PR #235 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/pull/235
GitHub pull request

fix(catalog): authorize relationship targets in related-record endpoints

Fix merged in geolens-io/geolens PR #234 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/pull/234
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Cross-dataset authorization bypass discloses private dataset metadata, schema, sample values, table rows, and raster/vector tile data · Advisory · geolens-io/geolens · GitHub

https://github.com/geolens-io/geolens/security/advisories/GHSA-p23g-mvhj-jh3j

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55178(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@geolens/sdk @ 1.2.3 (fixes < 1.2.3)—ghsa
pipgeolens @ 1.2.3 (fixes < 1.2.3)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 2 ecosystems)
PyPI(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
geolens0.0.0, 1.0.0, 1.2.0
  • every version up to 1.2.3: fixed in 1.2.3
—
geolens-cli1.0.0, 1.2.0
  • every version up to 1.2.3: fixed in 1.2.3
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
@geolens/sdk—
  • every version up to 1.2.3: fixed in 1.2.3
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p23g-mvhj-jh3j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  23. 2026-10-17 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
Show 52 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 11:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-10-02 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  30. 2026-09-27 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  32. 2026-09-27 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  34. 2026-09-25 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  36. 2026-09-24 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  38. 2026-09-23 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-22 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-20 22:43 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  42. 2026-09-19 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-19 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  45. 2026-09-18 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  47. 2026-09-17 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-17 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-16 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  51. 2026-09-15 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-18 18:09 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55178?
CVE-2026-55178 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 18, 2026. GeoLens is a self-hosted geospatial data catalog with semantic search, OGC and STAC APIs, and a map builder. Prior to 1.2.3, multiple read and link endpoints authorize only the resource named in the request URL and fail to re-authorize a second caller-influenced dataset reached through a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55178 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55178 was published on August 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55178 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55178 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55178?
CVE-2026-55178 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55178?
A fix for CVE-2026-55178 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-55178 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55178

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55178?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.