SIPSorcery is a WebRTC, SIP, and VoIP library for C# and .NET. Prior to 10.0.9, RTPChannel.OnRTPPacketReceived and the STUNAttribute.ParseMessageAttributes, STUNXORAddressAttribute, and STUNAddressAttribute parsing path index untrusted bytes without sufficient length checks, while UdpReceiver.EndReceiveFrom closes the channel when those operations raise a non-socket exception. A remote party can send a single short RTP packet or malformed zero-to-seven-byte STUN address attribute to the shared RTP/ICE socket, including during ICE connectivity checks before DTLS or STUN MESSAGE-INTEGRITY verification, and terminate the active RTP or WebRTC media session. The attacker must reach or learn the advertised ephemeral RTP/ICE port, but no authentication or user interaction is required, and the impact is limited to availability. This issue is fixed in version 10.0.9.
CVE-2026-54632
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-28. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-78055 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-28gm-jrmw-xx93 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 53rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 28, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026Malformed UDP packet on the RTP/ICE socket can remotely terminate a media session (DoS) · Advisory · sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery · GitHub
https://github.com/sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery/security/advisories/GHSA-28gm-jrmw-xx93Add minimum length checks for packets received on the RTP channel and for STUN attributes
Fix merged in sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery PR #1677 on 2026-06-07 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery/pull/1677commit bdb76cbc0c72 (sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery)
Fix landed in sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery commit bdb76cbc0c72 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery/commit/bdb76cbc0c7216e3126f743fb78e8525af56cea2Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54632(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| nuget | SIPSorcery @ 10.0.9 (fixes <= 10.0.8) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
NuGet(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIPSorcery | 1.3.0-PRE ... 8.0.9 (110 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-28gm-jrmw-xx93 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-31 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-24 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-17 04:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 48 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-28 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-25 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-23 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-22 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-20 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-18 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-17 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 13:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-28 17:21 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.5 HIGH
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54632?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54632 published?
Is CVE-2026-54632 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54632?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54632?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54632
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54632?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.